Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-df09.mx.aol.com (rly-df09.mail.aol.com [172.19.156.22]) by air-df05.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDF054-5794ad2f9b1124; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:41:22 -0400
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-df09.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDF096-5794ad2f9b1124; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:41:07 -0400
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1MxHNR-0005Ay-Jx
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:39:37 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1MxHNR-0005Ap-3Q
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:39:37 +0100
Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <gary.g4wgt@googlemail.com>)
	id 1MxHLx-0000Sj-I5
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:38:06 +0100
Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so8692289ewy.4
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ss+1xmOHU+tVmUjHeDSY7s2jQipqdpIebE/05y3BF80=;
        b=Q3nxcF00/KFXS4QKvlElnJ+dDv42V2j0Eba0rAO8/QW3IngXjI5Ic1U5rnq3biJ62d
         b3sbOc8fW/HOHJAedABTfMU+AhnzvklOXCy2iHzBQWiTClqWe2klgJgn52XpLwXk5GPy
         iFdGGGqeK8/wjsM/a4KyMi9e1o0bH7pbUYT+4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=xfC794qun+cYMG+7N91Em44Tu7weJIZodH3pkXYsf+1YZrOHU6fBH5QxzfXzFRvAFW
         xdqhYjwHqxDMOHgHSIFvFV8OGhtV9nszoAETjtDWM1kL8jmJDriGVc07ORoF3aTxdqfY
         4uyjAO9jOPxsqs4l02ykwHOoAVQJziEDjl20A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.211.146.5 with SMTP id y5mr6843927ebn.41.1255340359180; Mon, 
	12 Oct 2009 02:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <72445CC346B9474683C65741E109FED9@JimPC>
References: <1f0624b90910111111k48dbc99w46338e723f3684fb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <024801ca4a9f$9f087eb0$0217aac0@jimdesk>
	 <1f0624b90910111149k603e367dha9a95025b21d6f42@mail.gmail.com>
	 <D6849FB7FEFC457C9C0512154FD27378@JimPC>
	 <1f0624b90910111404s1260d39ehe005ef7eda670e92@mail.gmail.com>
	 <72445CC346B9474683C65741E109FED9@JimPC>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:39:17 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fd01fa13ca8871a3
Message-ID: <1f0624b90910120239u3b2c82fexa0d02251def0797@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Karma: unknown: 
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
Subject: Re: LF: RE: 503.6kHz Test
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bfbd2eb6ca0475b9b408
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d271.2 ; domain : googlemail.com DKIM : fail
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)


--001636c5bfbd2eb6ca0475b9b408
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Jim, LF,
Thank you for the plot & your observations. I have downloaded the plot to
study later.

I had not realised until after the PA FET failure on Saturday night that the
LPF toroids were very hot & need to be upgraded if I am going to run that
level of power again (5 watts ERP about 4 Amps antenna current). I must also
check the matching transformer toroids at the base of the antenna if that is
getting hot also, I may look into the alternative matching (tapped coil)
which you provided documentation & a spreadsheet for a while ago.

Keep up the good work, I am sure that we all appreciate your input, time &
efforts devoted to the hobby.

Cheers,

Gary - G4WGT.





2009/10/11 James Moritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>

> Dear Gary, LF Group,
>
> This is what the signal looks like for about 11/2 hours up to 2200utc. The
> red signal is G4WGT, the yellow one is G4JNT's WSPR beacon. The blue line is
> the noise level scaled to about 300Hz bandwidth, to give an idea of the
> audible strength as a CW signal. The plot settings are not ideal to show
> variations in signal level - there are actually short periods where the
> signal fades to inaudibility that don't show up here, but it gives a
> reasonable idea.
>
> G4WGT I think must be mainly sky wave here so presumably the fading is due
> to  different sky-wave paths.  G4JNT is a very stable ground wave signal
> here during the day, so I imagine the fading here is due to the combination
> of ground wave and sky wave.
>
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>

--001636c5bfbd2eb6ca0475b9b408
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jim, LF,<div><br></div><div>Thank you for the plot &amp; your observati=
ons. I have downloaded the plot to study later.</div><div><br></div><div>I=
 had not realised until after the PA FET failure on Saturday night that th=
e LPF toroids were very hot &amp; need to be upgraded if I am going to run=
 that level of power again (5 watts ERP about 4 Amps antenna current). I=
 must also check the matching transformer toroids at the base of the anten=
na if that is getting hot also, I may look into the alternative matching=
 (tapped coil) which you provided documentation &amp; a spreadsheet for a=
 while ago.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Keep up the good work, I am sure that we all appreciat=
e your input, time &amp; efforts devoted to the hobby.</div><div><br></div=
><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Gary - G4WGT.</div><div><br></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009=
/10/11 James Moritz <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:james.moritz@b=
topenworld.com">james.moritz@btopenworld.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc sol=
id;padding-left:1ex;">
Dear Gary, LF Group,<br>
<br>
This is what the signal looks like for about 11/2 hours up to 2200utc. The=
 red signal is G4WGT, the yellow one is G4JNT&#39;s WSPR beacon. The blue=
 line is the noise level scaled to about 300Hz bandwidth, to give an idea=
 of the audible strength as a CW signal. The plot settings are not ideal=
 to show variations in signal level - there are actually short periods whe=
re the signal fades to inaudibility that don&#39;t show up here, but it gi=
ves a reasonable idea.<br>

<br>
G4WGT I think must be mainly sky wave here so presumably the fading is due=
 to =A0different sky-wave paths. =A0G4JNT is a very stable ground wave sig=
nal here during the day, so I imagine the fading here is due to the combin=
ation of ground wave and sky wave.<div>
<div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br>
Cheers, Jim Moritz<br>
73 de M0BMU <br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001636c5bfbd2eb6ca0475b9b408--