Return-Path: Received: (qmail 44495 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 18:44:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 18:44:30 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Co4WK-000JxU-3p for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:44:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Co4WK-000JxR-1R for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:44:04 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Co4Wi-0002Xr-8y for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:44:28 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Co4Ti-0000D7-30 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:41:22 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Co4Th-0000Cx-Mn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:41:21 +0000 Received: from imo-d21.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.207]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co4Te-0006ET-5V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:41:21 +0000 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-d21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id l.1e9.3302d333 (4584) for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:40:58 -0500 (EST) From: G4gvw@aol.com Message-ID: <1e9.3302d333.2f14263a@aol.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:40:58 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5003 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of aol.com designates 205.188.144.207 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_40_50=0.086,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: Re: LF: Are we in January or April ? Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

I stil hold to the belief that they are successfully operating antennas that exist in this universe but radiate in another parallel universe. What I have so far failed to understand is why they have not extended their experimental efforts into designs incorporating tribar elements as these would have the credibility of being non-existant in ordinary Euclidean space but might be possible in the sense that consideration only of a small part of the element could give rise to a locally possible cohomology element. After all that we are only left with the problem of working out how to further distort Maxwell's work in order to explain just how we get antennas designed to these new criteria to radiate infinite power when fed with zero energy!

Dicken's Scrooge had it in two succinct words; "Bah! Humbug!"

73 and a Happy New Year to any I have missed so far.

de Pat g4gvw