Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.208.67 with SMTP id mc3csp6530igc; Sun, 11 May 2014 06:41:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.211.116 with SMTP id nb20mr11558115wic.5.1399815711620; Sun, 11 May 2014 06:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fo1si1684670wib.21.2014.05.11.06.41.51 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 06:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WjTVl-0002UZ-FZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:09:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WjTVk-0002UQ-Ky for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:09:48 +0100 Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WjTVi-0003KN-O7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:09:47 +0100 Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta11.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20140511130944.HNUZ6169.mta11.charter.net@imp11> for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 09:09:44 -0400 Received: from wt04 ([209.225.8.44]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id 0d9j1o00G0x0GZM05d9jvM; Sun, 11 May 2014 09:09:43 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=F7QP7ddN c=1 sm=1 a=TUjgDYZrz7uwj/84Ht9j4g==:17 a=cWQ9uGxeeyIA:10 a=rxNW6rG6YmEA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=GM_XKnmSUhoA:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=KW9mDFmcFP9ImlPIhYkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Xk8nURqvEdEBMXvmj_MA:9 a=eCVJwllyHyBN-47f:21 a=TUjgDYZrz7uwj/84Ht9j4g==:117 Received: from [67.158.169.212] by enhanced.charter.net with HTTP; Sun, 11 May 2014 09:09:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 09:09:43 -0400 (EDT) From: w1tag@charter.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <1de367ae.daf1b.145eb673f4f.Webtop.44@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Laszlo Mail 3 X-SID: 44 X-Originating-IP: [67.158.169.212] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Also thanks to W1TAG for the best DX. -42 dB, that's the lowest SNR i've ever seen in WSPR-15 :-) Stefan, My pleasure! Actually, I think the low SNR had more to do with local electrical noise than any weakness of your signal. This is my first weekend at our Maine QTH this year, and the LF band is noisier than I remember. I noticed yesterday that our nearest neighbor has taken to leaving incandescent light on in their cottage while they are away, and from the appearance, I'd say that they are being run by light dimmers. The owners are not here this weekend, so there's not much I can do. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: RE: WSPR-15 on 137.610 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3693279_1587742113.1399813783045" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_3693279_1587742113.1399813783045 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Also thanks to W1TAG for the best DX. -42 dB, that's the lowest SNR i've ever seen in WSPR-15 :-) Stefan, My pleasure! Actually, I think the low SNR had more to do with local electrical noise than any weakness of your signal. This is my first weekend at our Maine QTH this year, and the LF band is noisier than I remember. I noticed yesterday that our nearest neighbor has taken to leaving incandescent light on in their cottage while they are away, and from the appearance, I'd say that they are being run by light dimmers. The owners are not here this weekend, so there's not much I can do. Anyway, I'm rather amazed that there was anything to report! John, W1TAG ------=_Part_3693279_1587742113.1399813783045 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Also thanks to W1TAG for the best DX. -42 dB= , that's the lowest SNR i've ever seen in WSPR-15 :-)

Stefan,

My pleasure! Actually, I think t= he low SNR had more to do with local electrical noise than any weakness of = your signal. This is my first weekend at our Maine QTH this year, and the L= F band is noisier than I remember. I noticed yesterday that our nearest nei= ghbor has taken to leaving incandescent light on in their cottage while the= y are away, and from the appearance, I'd say that they are being run by lig= ht dimmers. The owners are not here this weekend, so there's not much I can= do.

Anywa= y, I'm rather amazed that there was anything to report!

John, W1TAG
------=_Part_3693279_1587742113.1399813783045--