Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,NO_REAL_NAME,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6JD2Ni0008655 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:02:24 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bPUVg-0004b2-1T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:52:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bPUVf-0004at-9V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:52:27 +0100 Received: from smtp-out01.xworks.net ([31.25.48.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bPUVd-0002vE-AG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:52:26 +0100 Received: from mailbackend1 (cluster06.xworks.net [10.100.1.80]) by smtp-out01.xworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9775618DD for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:52:23 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1468932743; bh=kk6GkGkM3hTUT6a0rbz9vdMiDwXzaXvv7UPLArUoKJQ=; h=In-Reply-To:From:To:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-type; b=H3Zs5icDUAe/Kh5l/GZ1/RITJeXvUpxHslIXwWxsOKIQn1CJsEqermDnZvAS96eTH Wq1wchp/k+yXtDYu1rNcoUAEz6/8B5dTzg6kFgK08p8oZ4zRKeeR/uygTvT2HkPiG/ cnC28wGyLBWnMQQNKJUPeiAVHyPp/7KHfXEIjDSs= In-Reply-To: <578DB39F.7060702@abelian.org> From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <1dbc83a6b5d14fe4a5d638cbbb55e322@kabelmail.de> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:52:22 +0200 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: AW: Re: ULF: Key down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8405

Stefan, Paul;

<if you want to swit= ch off?>

pse do not so=2E Im trying too=2E
yesterday I red= uced the FFT-bin in SL to 6,6uHz=2E it will last some days until SL wor= ks agn (30% acquisition now)=2E
next days Ill reduce the bandwidth a= gn=2E

Uwe/dj8wx

Von: Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian=2Eorg>
Gesendet: 19=2E= 07=2E2016 07:03
An: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg>
Betreff: Re: ULF: Ke= y down signal on the 101 km band, still on the air

= Stefan wrote:

> any results in a bandwidth < 1 uhz ?
so far nothing, not even in 0=2E6 uhz=2E

but the noise level i= s much higher than it could be=2E have to
work on the filter and bla= nker settings=2E will take some
time but i suspect a detection is po= ssible=2E

i probably have enough signal recorded by now (!), if = you
want to switch off?

--
paul nicholson
--

1=3D= "" uhz=3D"" so=3D"" far=3D"" nothing,=3D"" not=3D"" even=3D"" in=3D"" 0= =2E6=3D"" uhz=2E=3D"" but=3D"" the=3D"" noise=3D"" level=3D"" is=3D"" m= uch=3D"" higher=3D"" than=3D"" it=3D"" could=3D"" be=2E=3D"" have=3D"" = to=3D"" work=3D"" on=3D"" the=3D"" filter=3D"" and=3D"" blanker=3D"" se= ttings=2E=3D"" will=3D"" take=3D"" some=3D"" time=3D"" but=3D"" i=3D"" = suspect=3D"" a=3D"" detection=3D"" is=3D"" possible=2E=3D"" i=3D"" prob= ably=3D"" have=3D"" enough=3D"" signal=3D"" recorded=3D"" by=3D"" now=3D= "" (!),=3D"" if=3D"" you=3D"" want=3D"" to=3D"" switch=3D"" off?=3D"" -= -=3D"" paul=3D"" nicholson=3D"" --=3D""></ 1 uhz ?

so far = nothing, not even in 0=2E6 uhz=2E

but the noise level is much hi= gher than it could be=2E have to
work on the filter and blanker sett= ings=2E will take some
time but i suspect a detection is possible=2E=

i probably have enough signal recorded by now (!), if you
wa= nt to switch off?

--
paul nicholson
--

>