Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <1HLPzAABDg63MwCE@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:28:17 +0100
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Tom Boucher" <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: Current
In-reply-to: <E11U4RN-0001Xm-00@mserv1b.u-net.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Mike
This probably explains why my antenna current was always less than
expected when using my 160 metre dipole, with feeders strapped, dangling
through tree branches! I'm in process of moving to a new QTH where I
hope to erect something approaching a quarter wave of wire, so will have
to pay attention to insulators.

73 to all

Tom, G3OLB

>I commented that my antenna current had gone down following the 
>change from one top wire to three. I have re-engineered the far end 
>and have improved things. It seems that the far end insulation was 
>not as good as it could be (1m of plastic pipe). I have now restored 
>the current to what it was before the change by adding an extra 
>insulator in each leg.
>
>This shows that it is just as important to keep the far end 
>=extremely= well insulated as it is to minimise losses at the high 
>current end.
>
>The antenna still needs a little work to make it as mechanically stable 
>as possible, but it performs well. I have just had to put a small 
>attenuator in the front end of the receiver!
>
>I look forward to some reports at the weekend.
>
>
>Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
>http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm
>
>