Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.94]) by air-df08.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDF081-5efe4b4f11383b0; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:42:32 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-db10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DD9373800008B; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:42:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NVP0T-0007xb-OH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:40:57 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NVP0T-0007xS-7t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:40:57 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NVP0R-0002V3-9z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:40:57 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIEAPGfTktZ8bgK/2dsb2JhbACNZAbIc4QwBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,275,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="287738537" Received: from unknown (HELO TraceyPC) ([89.241.184.10]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2010 12:40:47 +0000 Message-ID: <1EFCA9A32D95487BB1DEAD82067AC23B@TraceyPC> From: "Tracey Gardner" To: References: <126980379.1263435061.156205952.17650@mcgi37.rambler.ru> <1f0624b91001140353le8ae77brd1d1180757a9f8f6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1f0624b91001140353le8ae77brd1d1180757a9f8f6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:40:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF:498.8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0210_01CA9516.CAA48840" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405e4b4f113636f6 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0210_01CA9516.CAA48840 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Gary Have you checked the REU list for your signal? http://www.classaxe.com/dx/ndb/reu/ If you do a search between 497kHz and 500kHz you'll find that there ar= e a good number of unid NDBs in that area.=20 Tracey ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gary - G4WGT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:53 AM Subject: Re: LF:498.8 Hi Roman, LF, I have also noticed the signal on 498.800 kHz. I have looked back at 3 days grabber saves & the signal fades in at= about 1530utc & fades out at about 0700utc the following morning. At= times there appears to an accompanying parallel signal about 1 kHz hi= gher which looks like an NDB ID (see attachment), but nothing on my li= sts for an NDB on that frequency.=20 I will set up another SpecLab to monitor that frequency & a few kHz= either side to watch for an ID type signal on the LF side as well as= the HF side of the carrier. I will report my findings to LF for anyne= who may be interested. 73, Gary - G4WGT. 2010/1/14 Roman RW3ADB Hi LF! What is a signal are visible onto G4WGT grabber around 498.8 kHz? http://rw3adb.narod.ru/2010/20100113_498.8/capt500-4.jpg http://rw3adb.narod.ru/2010/20100113_498.8/capt500-4.1.jpg -- Roman RW3ADB. ------=_NextPart_000_0210_01CA9516.CAA48840 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Gary
 
Have you checked the REU list for your signal?
 
 
If you do a search between 497kHz and 500kHz you'll find that the= re are a=20 good number of unid NDBs in that area.
 
Tracey
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 14,= 2010 11:53=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF:498.8

Hi Roman, LF,

I have also noticed the signal on 498.800 kHz.

I have looked back at 3 days grabber saves & the signal fad= es in at=20 about 1530utc & fades out at about 0700utc the following morning= . At times=20 there appears to an accompanying parallel signal about 1 kHz higher= which=20 looks like an NDB ID (see attachment), but nothing on my= lists for=20 an NDB on that frequency. 

I will set up another SpecLab to monitor that frequency &= a few kHz=20 either side to watch for an ID type signal on the LF side as well as= the HF=20 side of the carrier. I will report my findings to LF for anyne who= may be=20 interested.

73,  Gary - G4WGT.


2010/1/14 Roman RW3ADB <= rw3adb@rambler.ru>

Hi LF!
= What is a signal are visible onto G4WGT=20 grabber around 498.8 kHz?
http://rw3= adb.narod.ru/2010/20100113_498.8/capt500-4.jpg
http://rw3adb.narod.ru/2010/20100113_498.8/capt500-4.1.jp= g

--
Roman=20 RW3ADB.


------=_NextPart_000_0210_01CA9516.CAA48840--