Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com
Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp204683igb;
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.14.193.198 with SMTP id k46mr533198een.128.1382984428865;
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si15666752eeu.98.2013.10.28.11.20.28
for <daveyxm@virginmedia.com>;
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1VarOj-0001FU-Gq
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:18:41 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1VarOj-0001FL-1Q
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:18:41 +0000
Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk)
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>)
id 1VarOh-0002dQ-5i
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:18:39 +0000
Received: from AGB ([95.145.211.175])
by mwinf5d56 with ME
id iiJa1m00o3ncqbB03iJb0p; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:18:37 +0100
Message-ID: <1B1CBCE785AD46659FD37F1660ED7604@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <BLU180-W218D0A2A876EE4210606B7AC0E0@phx.gbl> <526D3F49.8070204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1382892371.130567697@f293.i.mail.ru> <526D44B0.5080909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1310271638540.9910@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <6076CAF35148475D99D0482270717BD0@White>,<002a01ced3cc$95e7f940$c1b7ebc0$@com> <BLU180-W116E49A82B6B2B4045B97FAC080@phx.gbl> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1310281344420.15394@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1310281344420.15394@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:18:34 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Thanks Joe , Its not that long since the first reports of
a 'strange cw' signal and fierce debates over the introduction of a 'new data
mode' ! and now the system is providing such a high level of access to 136
, its hard to see what the fuss was about .. ! [...]
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49
Subject: Re: LF: Re: OPDS 32...
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 2848
Thanks Joe ,
Its not that long since the first reports of a 'strange cw'
signal and fierce debates over the introduction of a 'new data mode'
! and now the system is providing such a high level of access to
136 , its hard to see what the fuss was about .. !
And not to mention Mr Ros , for coding the system in the first place
..
Opera is now listed in the ADIF modes list and counts as a data qso
04:29 136 VO1NA de SV8CS Op32 5889 km -35 dB F:4%
Excellent dx decode again , looked to be 6 dB in hand as well ,
interesting the fade % for long haul Dx is
showing as quite low , the same from JA to Alaska etc
BUT ... Once again , the PSK-Map is not a 100% record of activity ,
as this spot is not showing ! the higher the activity , the higher the
clipping ...
Over this period of activity , interested parties are best advised to
run the Opera software
on a web linked pc to ensure 100% of the spots are gathered and
retained !
73-Graham
G0NBD
--------------------------------------------------
From: <jcraig@mun.ca>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 4:18 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: RE: LF: Re: OPDS 32...
> Thanks to all, including Mr Ros for OP, Markus for OPDS and
> Graham for all the encouragement! Thanks also to
> Yuri EW6BN, Terry GW0EZY and Alex R7NT for the reports and
> others for the grabbers.
>
> Will be on again tonight 137.555 kHz OP32.
>
> 73
> Joe VO1NA
>
> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php
>