Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19563 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2000 22:54:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 25 Feb 2000 22:54:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12OTXU-0003lB-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:48:48 +0000 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12OTXT-0003l6-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:48:47 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from central.zetnet.co.uk (central.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.20]) by irwell.zetnet.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id WAA25517 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:48:28 GMT X-ZSender: g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <1996011005584468199@zetnet.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 05:58:44 GMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Peter Dodd" X-Mailer: ZIMACS Version 1.20c 10000836 Subject: LF: Re: 136kHz weak signals Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Last night, 14/2, at around 2035UT I saw I5TGG . His signal was 137.726kHz on my scale calling CQ but the signal faded out. Just a little earlier a strong QRSS signal at 137.729 is GM3YXM/P was seen (and heard) calling CQ. I was using Spectran, which has a better resolution for digging signals from between the Loran lines. The only disadvantage of this beta stage S/W is that you can only save images via Clipboard, which is a bit cumbersome. This I did and as I was converting the image to a .JPG to send to I5TGG I noticed another weak signal had been recorded at around 137.740kHz. It turned out to be sending the same data as GM3YXM/P but with a mystery delay timing difference of around three seconds. None of the signals was strong enough to cause non-linearity and there was no evidence of soundcard 'AGC' action that you sometimes see. So is it some sort of strange propagation effect? Most likely some image effect of the SW or soundcard- but why the time difference? I can send the .JPG image to anyone who is interested -- Regards, Peter, G3LDO