Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19692 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2005 17:59:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2005 17:59:51 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CnhLQ-0001zn-7O for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:59:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CnhLQ-0001zk-4b for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:59:16 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CnhLy-0005lT-Hd for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:59:50 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CnhJp-00053W-K5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:57:37 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CnhJp-00053N-8R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:57:37 +0000 Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.208]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CnhJm-0001VS-NS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:57:37 +0000 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id l.197.35d22bd8 (3924) for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:57:22 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <197.35d22bd8.2f12ca82@aol.com> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:57:22 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5036 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of aol.com designates 205.188.144.208 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_40_50=0.086,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: Re: LF: Are we in January or April ? Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

In a message dated 1/9/2005 6:19:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, dibene@usa.net writes:

And technical writers that cannot even correctly spell Tera (10^12) aren't
worth of any respect...

Can we be sure they meant 'tera'? Perhaps they literally mean Terra watts. Perhaps most of that Amazing Feedback Power must be dissipated in Mother Earth?

After all, if it is "much more powerful (with zero input power) than any other types of the future superpower projects," then it would surely be too dangerous to attach any transmitter with greater than zero power, and unleash all that energy into the open air.

Of course, there are also risks of dissipating the excess in the earth. If burrowing creatures find themselves too warm to hibernate and started roaming the countryside in winter, when their natural foods are not plentiful, it could trigger an ecological crisis.

John