Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.33.134 with SMTP id r6csp33698igi; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:57:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.81.129 with SMTP id x1mr20188387eey.82.1376204276019; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h5si22247223eeg.170.2013.08.10.23.57.55 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1V8CjB-0004Q8-Sj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 18:13:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1V8CjB-0004Pz-FP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 18:13:21 +0100 Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.130] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1V8Cj6-00046t-QB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 18:13:20 +0100 Received: from [10.220.171.240] ([10.163.22.176]) by mwinf5d68 with ME id B5DB1m00B3nxBYS035DDYE; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:13:15 +0200 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:13:10 +0200 From: Michel Brunel X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1947877520.20130810191310@mterrier.net> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <52066E53.8050304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <52066E53.8050304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, Make sure the save directory name contains backslashes and already exists zb: E:\Radio\wsprx\save [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 968492e608ae81f946d7c13a3d073eeb Subject: Re: LF: WSPRX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------09111916424DCCEB1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3319 ------------09111916424DCCEB1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, Make sure the save directory name contains backslashes and already exists zb: E:\Radio\wsprx\save HTH Michel - f5wk Le samedi 10 ao=FBt 2013 =E0 18:46:11, Stefan =E9crivait : > Hi all, > I'm still fighting with WSPR-15, RX wise. It simply doesn't work on my=20 > grabber PC. WSPR 2.0 works fine on LF and MF though. > I thought it could be a good idea to uninstall wsjtx and wsprx, then=20 > cleaning the registry and the whole PC, then installing WSPRX (WSPR-15)= =20 > again. > Maybe there are some DLLs left in the registry that cause problems, some= =20 > DLLs of older versions that haven't been replaced by the latest=20 > installation? > Does someone know which DLLs (or other stuff) belongs to wsjtx and wsprx= =20 > and where they can be found, and manually deleted? > I guess there must be something in the "system32" folder but i don't the= =20 > names of them... > Any help is apprechiated. > 73, Stefan/DK7FC -- ------------09111916424DCCEB1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LF: WSPRX Stefan,

Make sure the save directory name contains backslashes and already exists
zb:  E:\Radio\wsprx\save

HTH

Michel - f5wk


Le samedi 10 ao=FBt 2013 =E0 18:46:11, Stefan =E9crivait :

> Hi all,

> I'm still fighting with WSPR-15, RX wise. It simply doesn't work on my=  
> grabber PC. WSPR 2.0 works fine on LF and MF though.

> I thought it could be a good idea to uninstall wsjtx and wsprx, then&n= bsp;
> cleaning the registry and the whole PC, then installing WSPRX (WSPR-15= ) 
> again.

> Maybe there are some DLLs left in the registry that cause problems, so= me 
> DLLs of older versions that haven't been replaced by the latest <= br> > installation?

> Does someone know which DLLs (or other stuff) belongs to wsjtx and wsp= rx 
> and where they can be found, and manually deleted?

> I guess there must be something in the "system32" folder but i don't t= he 
> names of them...

> Any help is apprechiated.

> 73, Stefan/DK7FC






<= i>--  ------------09111916424DCCEB1--