Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w64GVLTQ030865 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 18:31:22 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fakVJ-0007bG-83 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 17:19:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fakVG-0007b7-Ni for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 17:19:38 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fakVD-0005rv-HX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 17:19:37 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id z13-v6so6670502wma.5 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgzU6pbXivVdj3+/N3XSfvc9379Y5wN3NhGjknLDVeY=; b=JuSShqSGlvWdCYuWjH66OjoBzfUJDtdnsgnqRoEtdKxuaWhicdqHOoZ7MiOxKKP3Ka L8OiMXbvWRzZRmksVX2TZzDJxtly/T5/BXDJeP6XiDWi0gy7iKtasOM/Gw4UEuZ3tFwJ SKtUXVUfFYYVFNCeZfJ051/J8xr9F4zKykbsG2Wc33CLAw3bXtd9reuZzOGhN+Pjf138 20qJIv+YX4Txv3/wq0wagX00BMUOB/NgKyq/89zyXLSmgi+sRGaEh4GlKNcp/v0AFTQU fyeq4/LBdM3Ck7sxCRvPMU/bTM84c86NcIr61gAZVmQA3RWY7raD4nr0au7nQqeMfqp4 6Fjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgzU6pbXivVdj3+/N3XSfvc9379Y5wN3NhGjknLDVeY=; b=uOThwJbbz61S5hmg7AjYCzmOHgn7Q1lblZcPAWOsUq4nBEhKqNF2aA+JAVmod/9oxk Zose5rsF8j6bvTZWNysyHSinnxz64HX9g7j41KLokK5dCrbI9BJx9spjqmTMDgFkkXnY 3PCiT4GpH8nBX1GCZz8QARZViWpKah0sO1/9wr4cxFdRGgJ92Wwj4PoaraVg2iSa9T3d CNb1sr4urZY87nTbKPbV9+Xq3jRfyxwBvNvH0W0p+Rbzpmmcckg7Doe8Jxj5izivwhbg 2/cesXr5bk7D0a1bTpaiiwVq81SQNqzqeHbnZmm9KFvcXEk11pKEqqj6n014Yb9Piu3O Twug== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3EUFIeE0CXu2udhNeLerU+IFJ4i2kVWSKXHCiqQH3Qjq47WesT EahGkwRvGFKfTrdtM2S1FDiGuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeNP6pR7pzOru3vl/35YsB3NhCSdupvLMRj4ryhWTsc9jJxX9hzr2Z6qJcBSlJ0mbMd/t3SKA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4643:: with SMTP id j3-v6mr2048744wrs.52.1530721174730; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o8-v6sm7840317wro.68.2018.07.04.09.19.33 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 17:19:32 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1939056784.20180704171932@gmail.com> To: Clemens Paul In-Reply-To: <347A959A86414E13B5FA34E1ABFAAE21@Clemens0811> References: <347A959A86414E13B5FA34E1ABFAAE21@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Clemens and all who have replied. Thanks for the splitting ideas, I have been away and am back and mulling them over. Much to consider, but i am wondering if long term I am better making the effort and investment in a second antenna a for MF reception. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:400c:c09:0:0:0:233 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: Can I match 2 frequencies with one loading coil? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Clemens and all who have replied. Thanks for the splitting ideas, I have been away and am back and mulling them over. Much to consider, but i am wondering if long term I am better making the effort and investment in a second antenna a for MF reception. Friday, June 29, 2018, 5:26:40 PM, you wrote: > Hi Mark and Chris, > on http://www.waniewski.de/LW/Lakihegy/lakihegy_lw_1en.htm > you can download a pdf file with a schematic etc. > of a 135.6kHz & 540kHz 100kW/150kW diplexer > Maybe that's a starting point for Chris' own design. > For download cklick on > http://www.waniewski.de/Pdf/1E-8920-810-DO_documentation%20diplexer%20Lakihegy.pdf > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com