Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x09CrdMk020457 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:53:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ghDIT-00041F-DF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 12:49:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ghDIS-000416-PT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 12:49:24 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1ghDIR-0007Ck-7i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 12:49:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id b11so7501092wmj.1 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 04:49:22 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lpPrSdJrk0KP++j/YgDRRY+jnwT8CiAVhQ76rk52ptQ=; b=TDGbh8/eVY0f0t818H3UFzokNIELKd3YUdHZMy/g+HUhlkMs2XoNDdInVWGnUmHitF td45vwWLxs2eDgkPQ+YvXp1DkZSBkVi8ahE6nmo2V75Gxh8mQMsltBCWyZ4+UGR6gcwv 6SDv72co3qVcDZtlHX93KiL4dypPM4I03U2M079RJgSLPNalNu6a0iR37mYnnBa8HdUu NambUiXxK4e71vT4B9dHwrP0uQ3sf06cz8s4mM1NEyCEwxMAbJ+TEZ5vvi3fSofwC1V6 pvrQSj6tv74RX+2qDhcqS99HFTE5uQ0IZn7VmrAUzMTtTOJpflX0Fd4LyT/7lZOgtwuJ 9CbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lpPrSdJrk0KP++j/YgDRRY+jnwT8CiAVhQ76rk52ptQ=; b=kL/heDJjF+CIS62eg7cZjOVrQmIGQaFYFRueknxv/3RKLNB73LOvbw1aJI+kZzdtKM QNVqTQN/CKe8zlFz5SxtFxpK7icVU7+9ZOzfbSoBQRHc7EhyW7nHjvIuW1Hd2raCLt1V 7VcJmA6GzPSt+iIVI7MN6Y9YkXDyrLkUO7mTU2axojTx+HlWUoa2tZYXlNuvwj60yuWg Ggbvc4tk0Gjpt7M2mHCaydxcvh8/tyY1wNAQt6LjnVnSIXXp0DnmaxFtde/2thMXAuIz /K2fjK1rT8xJ3v5rmR+qcjATt5V/mOxgpe7Wq10UOJuhV88iyEBsXeCFzVZB05GE3raI Y+fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfHDP2OcpoAv0wNSrGmgnpEYlxFuF958yRA4wI8PE5AS0mjnwlx cGRBNsdDAIBPEVZbs+sIksOQQ/nl X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7FJP91QvsspjR0/ng4my3Kwcy5XWkJ9n4wXfy0/6NBwN4LEjB+uCOt3TinokKKXUbx3mFQ7A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8b09:: with SMTP id n9mr5518536wmd.38.1547038161914; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 04:49:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12sm47700681wrx.31.2019.01.09.04.49.20 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Jan 2019 04:49:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:49:20 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <190928024.20190109124920@gmail.com> To: RSGG_LF MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello RSGG_LF, I have been active on 160m for a spell and am seeing lots of excellent spots of my signals using WSPR2 but with very disparate frequencies cited. is it me, or are some people not giving accurate freq [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:32c listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: LF: Another frequency stability question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello RSGG_LF, I have been active on 160m for a spell and am seeing lots of excellent spots of my signals using WSPR2 but with very disparate frequencies cited. is it me, or are some people not giving accurate frequency reports? How can I tell? same TS-590S shows very stable reports on LF. I am TX'ing ostensibly with 1550 audio. As the GPS locked LO in the 590 has failed it's on its stock none TCXO, but on LF reports are fine. Small example: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -19 0 IO82qv 1 TF3GZ HP75rm 1858 327 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -1 0 IO82qv 1 GM4OAS IO76cx 497 337 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -16 0 IO82qv 1 SWUKSDR/3 IO70jb 362 211 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838163 -10 0 IO82qv 1 G3JKV IO91uf 244 138 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -25 0 IO82qv 1 M0TAZ JO01cn 243 126 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838155 -11 0 IO82qv 1 G4MSA IO90au 232 168 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838148 -18 0 IO82qv 1 G8AOE IO94im 201 25 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838157 -3 0 IO82qv 1 G4BOO IO91ij 190 151 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838143 -7 0 IO82qv 1 M0ORH IO93ts 178 56 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -10 0 IO82qv 1 G0LUJ IO83ls 101 344 2019-01-09 12:38 2E0ILY 1.838152 -6 0 IO82qv 1 M0VSE IO92jp 99 106 Thanks. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com