Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9QAlo5p026566 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:47:52 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e7fcf-0007Wb-HV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:42:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e7fcX-0007WS-Oo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:42:41 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e7fcU-0007hq-SJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:42:40 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id y39so2708312wrd.4 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:42:38 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8vKdXVCA4nZW4Ef0YkO7wB+3FvSS3YD7z6LI44Hv2+s=; b=Hf2zGsJKp88M5eA3XmRsdRN9wJfyfOV67MPp+c5LAzXVvEYTxMgEhlYNsIRY24EqoN ndULrfDJjkaQTqugIBPG3y0DKO4RBXQMqLpueBskilWMXEvL4fv6Hro9Og65Seim2iWl dGhiaYwVn1nO1ADw542+ATue8G6ADmHIFFzKiYVKhFI6ar+dGKeG26MJZBIEaq3jfBZO N/mrOxe3na5NBsFEolKpinAEquy/aoIfT9hd4moYoEHrGH4hSXxpUnAERvnnh3bYhsd/ VUYVu4/+Lg+BcPLfScnZ8R6dCUV/aBHPgEfxXCiESVHCJ4IqRM3erlUeiR/cqFV06F2p 3Xrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8vKdXVCA4nZW4Ef0YkO7wB+3FvSS3YD7z6LI44Hv2+s=; b=FHQyoKhq1iOtsYZjmVNRhY0i4j9h5bTHyo5Im+7fACoGtSjbedWEhWYEylyO/iQKoF 5b58LTiMqSX6U7/E3DJBVyDYF45IJyA1ZH+72YTNKDWkVEcLs0CAi72Mf6DmEsUz66At rt75xngu8+1ZQDVazzDOsNogEwVd0hkGXXC7IonUzu389LExvH2d+ymjsAaqirV1E5nI LbQSRO9NCnRamx/vZNYkjUzCUd6OWWduwKQEgYYegij44KV0RguxZy3AuFmS6R1xcsFl UrZWJhJcHvT/rst2TUgbn2/mj77q7BzfOP0Ll6P+b4mdmbh0nZOd8pwccOL1HxxT93Dz A16g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXCnti+fFF2VUdDkL119syyWHneo64P8fhU2YxlGH+j3AVL7Dtj W3PoDMFixPbdKGUQNLGX47FeYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+T25RAXfBcHx/feQSV3k1LOpiMnV52d88fiXx9R6+g9Bc4MJadhwKUOkIauljjrz0DMtzK9Lg== X-Received: by 10.223.195.131 with SMTP id p3mr5290618wrf.89.1509014557574; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16sm5338945wrf.19.2017.10.26.03.42.36 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:42:35 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1876468406.20171026114235@gmail.com> To: N1BUG In-Reply-To: References: <4273a2ab-787c-d909-e7d0-d21db21ba18c@n1bug.com> <59EF0EDB.15093.422D52F1@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <59F05705.5020008@posteo.de> <59F1ADF3.16016.4C6AD4F6@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, I am surprised you have had issues with WSPR-X and WSPR15 I often forget I have it running in tandem with WSPR2 on WSJT-X and it is still sound and solid after a few days. PC is Windows 7 pro 64 bit. But it was also fine on Windows XP which I still run on another PC and on a laptop. The developers were very none receptive to adding WSPR15 to WSJT-X :( I keep trying to get over to Maine most nights, but conditions or Lady Luck have not obliged so far. There don't seem to be THAT many more US stations on LF after the licence change, I was expecting far more to be honest. Good luck Paul, don't let Mr. Beveredge down :) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: Monitoring 2190m WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Paul, I am surprised you have had issues with WSPR-X and WSPR15 I often forget I have it running in tandem with WSPR2 on WSJT-X and it is still sound and solid after a few days. PC is Windows 7 pro 64 bit. But it was also fine on Windows XP which I still run on another PC and on a laptop. The developers were very none receptive to adding WSPR15 to WSJT-X :( I keep trying to get over to Maine most nights, but conditions or Lady Luck have not obliged so far. There don't seem to be THAT many more US stations on LF after the licence change, I was expecting far more to be honest. Good luck Paul, don't let Mr. Beveredge down :) Thursday, October 26, 2017, 11:23:31 AM, you wrote: > I wish it were possible to have more WSPR-15 activity on LF. It > seems like a very promising mode and would be much more interesting > to me than Op32. Unfortunately for many of us the old WSPR-X > software needed to decode it is too unstable to run unattended. > Unless there are MANY requests to the developers that WSPR-15 be > included in the stable WSJT-X software, I am afraid we have seen the > death of this sub-mode. If I could have a stable WSPR-15 decoder I > would definitely monitor that mode alongside WSPR-2. > I'm struggling with my U3S assembly. All went well until I got to > the coils in the LF and MF low pass filters. Those are giving me > fits. The supplied wire came with many pre-installed sharp kinks, > plus I seem to have no skill whatsoever at this "scramble winding" > to get the required turns on the cores. I'm waiting now for a new > spool of wire to arrive before I try again. I've thought about > substituting a different core to allow a single layer winding. A > FT-37-61 would be lovely with 31 turns on LF. However I fear the Q > would be too low and losses high. Best to stick with what is proven, > if I can only learn to wind the devils! > I have the GPS with my U3S and also the OCXO (which I plan to > assemble later, after getting everything working with the standard > synthesizer). > 73, > Paul N1BUG -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com