Return-Path: Received: (qmail 382 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 18:28:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 18:28:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 22937 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 18:28:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 18:28:18 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14cWwR-000744-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:21:11 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14cWwQ-00073y-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:21:10 +0000 Received: from [147.197.200.44] (helo=gemini) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #4) id 14cWw5-0005pK-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:20:49 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <17876.200103121820@gemini> From: "James Moritz" Organization: University of Hertfordshire To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:25:29 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: Re: Active antennas at LF. In-reply-to: <65AECDF1F89AD411900400508BFC869F9C03BE@pdw-mail-1.dera.gov.uk> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear Andy, LF Group,

>The amp is specified as having a 50dBm third order intercept >point and by my reckoning could function as a power amp >delivering over 10W. That's linear !!! Frequency response is >10kHz to 60MHz.

Sounds like the kind of thing I could do with - living near Brookmans Park gives me MF field strengths of the order of 10V/m RMS, and much higher than that on the peaks. I abandoned attempts to make a wideband whip when I observed about 40v pk-pk RF on a 1m antenna connected to a scope probe... A tuned input certainly makes life easier sometimes!

I read somewhere that pre-WW2 naval receiving systems, using basically long-wire antennas, were designed to operate with "up to 100V" unwanted signal on the antenna, with frequency separation of 10% or more. This was achieved using passive preselectors. The ob jective was to allow simultaneous multi - transmitter operation. When the war broke out, it was not found to be a big issue, because radio transmission from ships was kept to an absolute minimum to avoid direction-finding.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU