Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13054 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2002 17:37:26 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 17:37:26 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 15559 invoked by uid 10001); 27 Oct 2002 18:41:06 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 18:41:06 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 185rKk-0000Jd-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:36:18 +0000 Received: from [64.12.136.163] (helo=imo-m08.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 185rKk-0000JS-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:36:18 +0000 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id l.171.1635c030 (4328) for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:36:15 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <171.1635c030.2aed7e0f@aol.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:36:15 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: Spam via reflector Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group In a message dated 10/27/02 10:47:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, stewart.bryant@virgin.net writes: << There are two approaches to requiring registration. Either it's automatic, or it's manual controlled by the list owner. If it is controlled by the list owner, this can be quite a lot of work and there is a delay waiting action. Remember it's not just new joiners that have to be managed, it's ISP changes as well. >> All true. But automatic or manual registration is not really pertinent to the issue of allowing NON-subscribers to post. This is a simple configuration setting in majordomo. I only vaguely remember the last discussion of why this is permitted, but it seems to me that one point did have something to do with people wanting to post messages while at work or otherwise away from their home Internet accounts. I can see the merit of one-way communication if one is away on a DXpedition and is temporarily using someone else's e-mail to report on operating schedules, for instance. But that is a rather rare use compared to the amount of spam lately. (There are also alternatives, such as sending e-mail to one of the regular members of the list and asking them to forward to it.) Other than that, can anyone think of times when one-way communication to the list serves a useful purpose? 73, John Davis