Return-Path: Received: from rly-me05.mx.aol.com (rly-me05.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.39]) by air-me05.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINME053-9ba4b210bdd6b; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:55:51 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me05.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME056-9ba4b210bdd6b; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:55:27 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NIkPT-0002sA-Nf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:54:27 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NIkPT-0002s1-4M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:54:27 +0000 Received: from web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.124]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NIkPS-0003Ty-Vk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:54:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 61753 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2009 14:54:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1260456861; bh=ZaGW9BGPfHHbi6ILie5+4dmtkU3apg9lS/OZYKfrvkA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qDAoanCqGmA/cPw8Wecig3QaQpjgkuqS5H57ZAah0O55xnFrJEon8EzVU/Pyfjvc3DjG58Eay3MhLobLOyn2VX1q73oSkQlBxtZ+/B+5K9UAGjFwp0Uv+kNUWi8sHEGvugD9ER/oyE/JyZWJGP1AVe1ZhngN+Rm1l3dBEFVsxT0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nnhCz/saZoKPrWISy0LSyL1PQPfelpNKY8okgbVzpFxtTNr8rQqPTpwQYjyiW/94U8tOL4UK5dep8mX9Vs7ebN2HzOM48t3ZgFuGWwbP5FYJZ4NnChJ5Qq/5hW53jwqy28PxOg8v47LYimDvcMWXwAsaQ3kck/UY91tuiDgBzTk=; Message-ID: <170190.60453.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: EBPzFqIVM1k9ets_N0p1mDsn3UdQgKlNG9MkRc6SF4FA3eFzEN2atu8M9xCE7HvMLFIqMnGfKflqwkzEDJAblBDSrPGfjxksH9BjO6yqNBV_aB5LVpxE2mRQ0t5wKhZRR_GlPDxjmamqu3UmA1VWG1iiJhLqTBz8fbr4.4ydGY1k0tqobFAfyzVh4avMkoW6ed2Psn2UV295ve_67CjMcrI1HrRBRGUZf2N0t8MoWrbCFFuOBgiE7Ae5M9lPprGEZdAaYaepvDrIVwQTF_I- Received: from [86.149.155.134] by web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:54:20 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.0.19 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:54:20 -0800 (PST) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <200912101311320337.00F58B02@smtp2.numeo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1103490079-1260456860=:60453" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d242.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass --0-1103490079-1260456860=:60453 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John =A0 Have you received my parcel yet,=A0with the soft rock ? =A0 73 petefmt --- On Thu, 10/12/09, John RABSON wrote: From: John RABSON Subject: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thursday, 10 December, 2009, 12:11 I believe (though I can't find the reference) that someone in France made= an informal enquiry - not via REF) about the equivalent of an NoV for 500= .=A0 The reply translated as "that part of the spectrum is not allocation= to the amateur service". F5VLF *********** REPLY SEPARATOR=A0 *********** On 10/12/2009 at 03:27 M0FMT wrote: >FYI=A0 ?? >"There is opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime servic= e >via the International Maritime Organisation and this has led to France >presenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that suggests a use for the ban= d >495-505 kHz using datamodes.=A0=A0This was in response to papers from Can= ada >and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur band between 493 and 510(515= ) >kHz.=A0=A0There appears to be no commercial or technical reasoning behind= this >paper and it is suspected to be based on emotive grounds >only.=A0=A0Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requires a lot more suppor= t if >it is going to be successful." >73 petefmt =20 --0-1103490079-1260456860=:60453 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi John
 
Have you received my parcel yet, with the soft rock ?
 
73 petefmt

--- On Thu, 10/12/09, John RABSON <john.ra= bson@numeo.fr> wrote:

From: John RABSON <john.rabson= @numeo.fr>
Subject: Re: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items
To: rs= gb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Thursday, 10 December, 2009, 12:11
=
I believe (though I can't find the reference) that= someone in France made an informal enquiry - not via REF) about the equiv= alent of an NoV for 500.  The reply translated as "that part of the= spectrum is not allocation to the amateur service".

F5VLF

*= ********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 10/12/2009 at 03:27= M0FMT wrote:

>FYI  ??
>"There is opposition to this= proposal, primarily from the maritime service
>via the Internationa= l Maritime Organisation and this has led to France
>presenting a pap= er under agenda item 1.10 that suggests a use for the band
>495-505= kHz using datamodes.  This was in response to papers from Canad= a
>and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur band between 493 and= 510(515)
>kHz.  There appears to be no commercial or tech= nical reasoning behind this
>paper and it is suspected to be based= on emotive grounds
>only.  Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requi= res a lot more support if
>it is going to be successful."
>73= petefmt






=20 --0-1103490079-1260456860=:60453--