Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x15BkfJE009019 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:46:49 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gqz7h-0007Bz-3d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:42:41 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gqz7g-0007Bq-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:42:40 +0000 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gqz7e-0002Iu-UT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:42:39 +0000 Received: from feu8 (10.192.64.18) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5B27C17305555DF8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:42:36 +0100 Received: from (93.146.209.118) by webmailtin.pc.tim.it; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:42:36 +0100 Message-ID: <168bd7790fd.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:42:36 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 93.146.209.118:51482 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Roelof, thanks for the feeback! so I have not to plan a QTH change ;-) In case will plan to move close to the seaside in a warm area thus can enjoy both ham radio and diving :-))) 73, Marco IK1H [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.236 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: R: Re: R: LF: MF WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_43644_19947591.1549366956289" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_43644_19947591.1549366956289 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Roelof, thanks for the feeback! so I have not to plan a QTH change ;-) In case will plan to move close to the seaside in a warm area thus can enjoy both ham radio and diving :-))) 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: roelof@ndb.demon.nl Data: 5-feb-2019 12.35 A: Ogg: Re: R: LF: MF WSPR Hello Marco, Your observations agree with what I found in regard to reception of T/A NDB's. Except for Puerto Rico, reception is very poor and northern Canada has been absent as well. On NAVTEX 518 kHz the most consistant T/A station has been Miami. So, yes it is propagation to blame! 73, Roelof, pa0rdt ------=_Part_43644_19947591.1549366956289 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Roelof,

thanks for the feeback! so I have not to plan a QTH change ;-)

In case will plan to move close to the seaside in a warm area thus can enjoy both ham radio and diving :-)))

73, Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: roelof@ndb.demon.nl
Data: 5-feb-2019 12.35
A: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: Re: R: LF: MF WSPR

Hello Marco,

Your observations agree with what I found in regard to reception of T/A NDB's.
Except for Puerto Rico, reception is very poor and northern Canada has been absent as well.

On NAVTEX 518 kHz the most consistant T/A station has been Miami.

So, yes it is propagation to blame!

73,
Roelof, pa0rdt



------=_Part_43644_19947591.1549366956289--