Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0QDY1b8003994 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:34:02 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gnO28-0000lE-5q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:30:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gnO27-0000l5-LH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:30:03 +0000 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gnO22-0003qR-A7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 13:30:02 +0000 Received: from feu2 (10.192.64.12) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5B27C173052FD248 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:29:57 +0100 Received: from (79.40.224.233) by webmailtin.pc.tim.it; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:29:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1688a5a4244.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:29:57 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 79.40.224.233:1812 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: so you are planning the old fashion indoor frame antenna ;-) For a longer life of the caps, WIMA has detailed datasheet and you can find series with specified current limits. Also CD has caps with hig [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.236 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c95b9a52470b89d54f2ef38e923e05cb Subject: R: Re: R: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30443_29906797.1548509397579" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_30443_29906797.1548509397579 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable so you are planning the old fashion indoor frame antenna ;-) For a longer life of the caps, WIMA has detailed datasheet and you can find= series with specified current limits. Also CD has caps with high current. Remaining in argoument of small antennas wish to post the almost incredible= resoults of a friend of mine: he has a D2T antenna which is sold as broadb= and antenna (in fact it is a terminated transmission line.. something like = a folded elevated beverage ;-). Although the very small footprint, after adding a second impedance transfor= mer (the original one because of the core is limited to 160m), he tested D2= T on MF and even LF. The gain (loss) of the antenna is a bit more than a du= mmy load, but he got wspr spot from several hundred km distance! 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: selberdenken@posteo.de Data: 26-gen-2019 13.57 A: Ogg: Re: R: LF: TXing WSPR/MF on an indoor loop Hi Paul, Oh yes, you are right, i forgot that. In the same way they could limit=20 the maximum current at a given frequency and capacity... But this is probably to keep a certain life time and guarantee a certain=20 deviation of the nominal capacity, for commercial applications... I'm just thinking about a multi-turn TX loop that uses no capacitor at=20 all. Imagine a loop with say 15 turns of the same wire i am using now.=20 It will have 45 Ohm then? Now one turn results in 0.2 Ohm. When touching=20 the capaciors during the transmission, i notice they heat up by 15 =C2=B0C= =20 maybe, not to much. So i estimate the losses are about 2 W, i.e. most of=20 the losses are in the wire. A loop of 15 turns will have an internal=20 capacity and a self resonance frequency. Maybe it can be tuned to 475=20 kHz, then you can close the loop without a serial C! and inject a RF=20 current with a ferrite core just like i do now. The residual impedance=20 will have no reactive component. And then, the limiting factor will be=20 the maximum temperature of the wire and its mechanical expansion when it=20 becomes warm, which will detune the loop like the upheating capacitor=20 does. But that time constant will be higher, so you tune it out for a=20 given average power when TXing WSPR. 73, Stefan Am 26.01.2019 13:02, schrieb N1BUG: > Hi Stefan, > > Congrats on your results with the small indoor loop! > > =20 >> The limiting factor in that system is the capacitor! I use 2.2 nF +6.8 >> nF + 1090 pF variable C. Maybe it can be optimised by using 10 x 1 nF >> WIMA-FKP-1-2000. The voltage is about 450 V, which is well below the 700 >> V limit. >> =20 > You may want to take a close look into the WIMA data sheet. There > are charts showing maximum permitted Vrms vs. frequency. I think you > may find the 1 nF 2000VDC / 700VAC FKP is derated to around 300 Vrms > at 475 kHz. I had some experience destroying these things... :-) > > 73, > Paul > > =20 ------=_Part_30443_29906797.1548509397579 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable so you are planning the old fashion indoor frame antenna ;-)
For a longe= r life of the caps, WIMA has detailed datasheet and you can find series wit= h specified current limits.
Also CD has caps with high current.
Remai= ning in argoument of small antennas wish to post the almost incredible reso= ults of a friend of mine: he has a D2T antenna which is sold as broadband a= ntenna (in fact it is a terminated transmission line.. something like a fol= ded elevated beverage ;-).
Although the very small footprint, after addi= ng a second impedance transformer (the original one because of the core is = limited to 160m), he tested D2T on MF and even LF. The gain (loss) of the a= ntenna is a bit more than a dummy load, but he got wspr spot from several h= undred km distance!

73, Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: selberdenken@posteo.de
Data: 26-gen-2= 019 13.57
A: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: Re: R: LF: TXi= ng WSPR/MF on an indoor loop

Hi Paul,

Oh yes, you are right, = i forgot that. In the same way they could limit
the maximum current at = a given frequency and capacity...
But this is probably to keep a certain= life time and guarantee a certain
deviation of the nominal capacity, f= or commercial applications...

I'm just thinking about a multi-turn T= X loop that uses no capacitor at
all. Imagine a loop with say 15 turns = of the same wire i am using now.
It will have 45 Ohm then? Now one turn= results in 0.2 Ohm. When touching
the capaciors during the transmissio= n, i notice they heat up by 15 =C2=B0C
maybe, not to much. So i estimat= e the losses are about 2 W, i.e. most of
the losses are in the wire. A = loop of 15 turns will have an internal
capacity and a self resonance fr= equency. Maybe it can be tuned to 475
kHz, then you can close the loop = without a serial C! and inject a RF
current with a ferrite core just li= ke i do now. The residual impedance
will have no reactive component. An= d then, the limiting factor will be
the maximum temperature of the wire= and its mechanical expansion when it
becomes warm, which will detune t= he loop like the upheating capacitor
does. But that time constant will = be higher, so you tune it out for a
given average power when TXing WSPR= .

73, Stefan

Am 26.01.2019 13:02, schrieb N1BUG:
> Hi S= tefan,
>
> Congrats on your results with the small indoor loop!=
>
>   
>> The limiting factor in that= system is the capacitor! I use 2.2 nF +6.8
>> nF + 1090 pF variab= le C. Maybe it can be optimised by using 10 x 1 nF
>> WIMA-FKP-1-2= 000. The voltage is about 450 V, which is well below the 700
>> V = limit.
>>     
> You may want to t= ake a close look into the WIMA data sheet. There
> are charts showing= maximum permitted Vrms vs. frequency. I think you
> may find the 1 n= F 2000VDC / 700VAC FKP is derated to around 300 Vrms
> at 475 kHz. I = had some experience destroying these things... :-)
>
> 73,
&= gt; Paul
>
>   



------=_Part_30443_29906797.1548509397579--