Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w786ldKb008263 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:47:42 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fnI2w-0001gJ-Pv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 07:34:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fnI2c-0001g6-O1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 07:33:54 +0100 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fnI2a-0006rc-FR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 07:33:53 +0100 Received: from feu18 (10.192.64.28) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5B27C17301107926 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:33:40 +0200 Received: from (80.182.129.41) by webmailtin.pc.tim.it; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:33:40 +0200 Message-ID: <165183dae71.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:33:40 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 80.182.129.41:1242 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, amazing :-) simply amazing! (I heard that somewhere in the Pentagon are getting worried...) :-D [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.236 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [212.216.176.236 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Scan-Signature: f6bad70c4aa77b0bf5528aff34072d8d Subject: R: Re: ULF: Experimenting on 2470 Hz and 1970 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17008_734052.1533710020213" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_Part_17008_734052.1533710020213 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan, amazing :-) simply amazing! (I heard that somewhere in the Pentagon are getting worried...) :-D 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: selberdenken@posteo.de Data: 7-ago-2018 22.29 A: Ogg: Re: ULF: Experimenting on 2470 Hz and 1970 Hz --> ULF, With some delay here (attachment) are the spectrograms showing the carrier transmissions in 424 uHz FFT bin width. I would say it is 'O copy' and it clearly looks like there is some room for even longer waves to try :-) I already checked what Wikipedia tells about SLF, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_low_frequency 73, Stefan Am 06.08.2018 16:19, schrieb DK7FC: Hi ULF, On Sunday, 5th 2018 i successfully crossed the far field border on 2470 Hz for the first time. That's the 121 km band. Later i even crossed it on 1970 Hz, the 152 km band. These are two new records of the lowest frequency signals generated by amateurs and received in the far field. The distance between RX and TX was 55.6 km . The far field for 2470 Hz starts at 19.4 km distance. For 1970 Hz it starts at 24.3 km distance. The RX antenna and the TX antennas were loops! By running about 100 W (PA DC input) i managed to get 910 mA antenna current on 2470 Hz into the earth loop in JN39WI. Here i transmitted a plain carrier from 06:13...07:15 UTC. Later i QSYed to 1970 Hz and here i got 910 mA as well. The 1970 Hz transmission took place from 07:19...08:21 UTC. Despite beeing in the middle of a large forest there was good internet connectivity and so i was able so watch my own grabber window showing the band activity on 2470 Hz in a spectrogram of 424 uHz FFT bin width, which is very wide for that frequency range! The spectrogram uses a Hann window and the FFT window time is about 40 minutes, so it took some time until a peak builts up. But already after 20 minutes i saw that something happens! After 40 minutes the carrier transmission reached an SNR of about 20 dB! It was a relatively quiet morning for early August. All the VLF stream data is stored into a ~ 12 day covering buffer so i have the chance to optimise the filter settings and antenna mixing in a postprocessing to achieve the best SNR from the system. For the 1970 Hz transmission there was no spectrogram available but since i had internet access and a Linux notebook available, i processed the VLF stream data (via SSH remote access to the storage PC) during the transmission and followed the peak's SNR building up! It clearly looks like this antenna outperforms my large inverted L in 30 m above the ground, at least into the ULF range! This opens up a new room for experimentation on the way down to DC! :-) Now i need to get rid of these output transformers since they will become problematic for wide-band experimentation on ULF / SLF. Now, attached you can find two images showing spectrum peaks from the two bands, out of the 55.6 km distance. The complete transmission time is here integrated in one peak. Since the carrier S/N can also be calculated from decoding a '*' message in EbNaut, i also show the results for such calculation along with the whole postprocessing chain. Spectrograms will be produced as well, but this will take a few hours here... 73, Stefan ------=_Part_17008_734052.1533710020213 Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan,

amazing :-) simply amazing!

(I heard that somewhere in the Pentagon are getting worried...) :-D

73, Marco IK1HSS

----Messaggio originale----
Da: selberdenken@posteo.de
Data: 7-ago-2018 22.29
A: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: Re: ULF: Experimenting on 2470 Hz and 1970 Hz

ULF,

With some delay here (attachment) are the spectrograms showing the carrier transmissions in 424 uHz FFT bin width. I would say it is 'O copy' and it clearly looks like there is some room for even longer waves to try :-)

I already checked what Wikipedia tells about SLF, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_low_frequency

73, Stefan


Am 06.08.2018 16:19, schrieb DK7FC:
Hi ULF,

On Sunday, 5th 2018 i successfully crossed the far field border on 2470 Hz for the first time. That's the 121 km band. Later i even crossed it on 1970 Hz, the 152 km band. These are two new records of the lowest frequency signals generated by amateurs and received in the far field. The distance between RX and TX was 55.6 km . The far field for 2470 Hz starts at 19.4 km distance. For 1970 Hz it starts at 24.3 km distance. The RX antenna and the TX antennas were loops!

By running about 100 W (PA DC input) i managed to get 910 mA antenna current on 2470 Hz into the earth loop in JN39WI. Here i transmitted a plain carrier from 06:13...07:15 UTC.
Later i QSYed to 1970 Hz and here i got 910 mA as well. The 1970 Hz transmission took place from 07:19...08:21 UTC.

Despite beeing in the middle of a large forest there was good internet connectivity and so i was able so watch my own grabber window showing the band activity on 2470 Hz in a spectrogram of 424 uHz FFT bin width, which is very wide for that frequency range! The spectrogram uses a Hann window and the FFT window time is about 40 minutes, so it took some time until a peak builts up. But already after 20 minutes i saw that something happens! After 40 minutes the carrier transmission reached an SNR of about 20 dB! It was a relatively quiet morning for early August.
All the VLF stream data is stored into a ~ 12 day covering buffer so i have the chance to optimise the filter settings and antenna mixing in a postprocessing to achieve the best SNR from the system.

For the 1970 Hz transmission there was no spectrogram available but since i had internet access and a Linux notebook available, i processed the VLF stream data (via SSH remote access to the storage PC) during the transmission and followed the peak's SNR building up!

It clearly looks like this antenna outperforms my large inverted L in 30 m above the ground, at least into the ULF range! This opens up a new room for experimentation on the way down to DC! :-) Now i need to get rid of these output transformers since they will become problematic for wide-band experimentation on ULF / SLF.

Now, attached you can find two images showing spectrum peaks from the two bands, out of the 55.6 km distance. The complete transmission time is here integrated in one peak. Since the carrier S/N can also be calculated from decoding a '*' message in EbNaut, i also show the results for such calculation along with the whole postprocessing chain.

Spectrograms will be produced as well, but this will take a few hours here...

73, Stefan


------=_Part_17008_734052.1533710020213--