Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0R9iq6p011699 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 10:44:55 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1efMrA-0002Ga-Ik for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 09:33:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1efMr9-0002GR-HR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 09:33:03 +0000 Received: from emout04.email.it ([212.97.34.71]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efMr5-0002Nb-I9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 09:33:02 +0000 Received: from emout04.email.it (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by emout04.email.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2D7961C8; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 10:32:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from x220.localnet (62-11-165-100.dialup.tiscali.it [62.11.165.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by emout04.email.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93C08961C5; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 10:32:51 +0100 (CET) From: Claudio Pozzi To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 10:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: <16491181.YX67Dq7RuY@x220> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <686847880.20180126193617@gmail.com> References: <1371247928.20180126134524@gmail.com> <686847880.20180126193617@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Friday 26 January 2018 19:36:17 you wrote: > I just completed two scope measurements at R17 to pin 3 of the divider > IC. One of the faulty LF Softrock, and one on my MF one that works > fine. the resultant wave forms are quite different. But I am not > clever enough to say if they hold the clue, so will post them here. > Thanks again. > > Faulty LF oscillator or divider first > > http://www.gatesgarth.com/R17-to-pin3.jpg > > > Working MF Softrock, same place > > http://www.gatesgarth.com/mf-R17-to-pin3.jpg [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (smtp01[at]email.it) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (smtp01[at]email.it) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 6be9408bcc63ba5aab6f1e66e2d5b7ce Subject: Re: LF: Softrock RX divider IC problem, unexpected frequency out Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart47409230.2XA95U0T4B" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_60_70, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --nextPart47409230.2XA95U0T4B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 26 January 2018 19:36:17 you wrote: > I just completed two scope measurements at R17 to pin 3 of the divider > IC. One of the faulty LF Softrock, and one on my MF one that works > fine. the resultant wave forms are quite different. But I am not > clever enough to say if they hold the clue, so will post them here. > Thanks again. > > Faulty LF oscillator or divider first > > http://www.gatesgarth.com/R17-to-pin3.jpg > > > Working MF Softrock, same place > > http://www.gatesgarth.com/mf-R17-to-pin3.jpg The scope is DC or AC coupled? I see a negative low level in both printout. 73 Claudio ik2pii -- ZE-Light e ZE-Pro: servizi zimbra per caselle con dominio email.it, per tutti i dettagli Clicca qui http://posta.email.it/caselle-di-posta-z-email-it.php?utm_campaign=email_Zimbra_102014=main_footer/f Sponsor: Soluzioni di email hosting per tutte le esigenze: dalle caselle gratuite a quelle professionali su piattaforma Zimbra, da quelle su proprio dominio a quelle certificate PEC. Confronta le soluzioni Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=13325&d=27-1 --nextPart47409230.2XA95U0T4B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

On Friday 26 January 2018 19:36:17 you wrote:

> I just completed two scope measurements at R17 to pin 3 of the divider

> IC. One of the faulty LF Softrock, and one on my MF one that works

> fine. the resultant wave forms are quite different. But I am not

> clever enough to say if they hold the clue, so will post them here.

> Thanks again.

>

> Faulty LF oscillator or divider first

>

> http://www.gatesgarth.com/R17-to-pin3.jpg

>

>

> Working MF Softrock, same place

>

> http://www.gatesgarth.com/mf-R17-to-pin3.jpg

 

The scope is DC or AC coupled? I see a negative low level in both printout.

 

73

Claudio ik2pii




----
ZE-Light e ZE-Pro: servizi zimbra per caselle con dominio email.it, per tutti i dettagli clicca qui

Sponsor:
Soluzioni di email hosting per tutte le esigenze: dalle caselle gratuite a quelle professionali su piattaforma Zimbra, da quelle su proprio dominio a quelle certificate PEC. Confronta le soluzioni
Clicca qui

--nextPart47409230.2XA95U0T4B--