Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w36DpxXf006149
	for <rlg@klubnl.pl>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:52:01 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1f4Ree-00063C-3n
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:43:48 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1f4Rec-000633-32
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:43:46 +0100
Received: from smtp3web.tin.it ([212.216.176.237])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <marcocadeddu@tin.it>)
	id 1f4ReU-0005Zd-4C
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:43:44 +0100
Received: from feu20 (10.192.64.30) by smtp3web.tin.it (8.6.060.43)
        id 5AB0B67900511AE8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:43:30 +0200
Received: from (93.146.209.118) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it;  Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:43:30 +0200
Message-ID: <1629b32a56a.marcocadeddu@tin.it>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:43:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" <marcocadeddu@tin.it>
To:  <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: 93.146.209.118
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  ... simply amazing :-)) well done Stefan, Edgard and all the
    contributors! Marco, IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: 6-apr-2018 14.03
    A: Ogg: VLF: Carrier detection DL > VK7 on 17.4701 kHz Hi VLF, [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it)
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
X-Scan-Signature: 118b9e608370528226a3c3b3aedcdda0
Subject: R: VLF: Carrier detection  DL > VK7 on 17.4701 kHz
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false


... simply amazing :-))
well done Stefan, Edgard and all the contributors!

Marco, IK1HSS 
----Messaggio originale----
Da: selberdenken@posteo.de
Data: 6-apr-2018 14.03
A: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: VLF: Carrier detection  DL > VK7 on 17.4701 kHz

Hi VLF,

A few weeks ago i had the crazy idea to try an attempt to be detected 
on 
17.4701 kHz in Tasmania / VK7.

Edgar J.T. is the one on the other side. A few years ago he managed to 
detect my DFCW-180 signal on 136 kHz at two different locations. He is 
currently watching ZEVS as well as other special signals on the VLF.

Using an omidirectional whip antenna on his side we attempted to 
detect 
a pure carrier transmission that was transmitted daily from my site in 
JN49IK00WD, beginning at March, 15th.
Each day i transmitted from 16...23 UTC with about 1 A antenna current 
on my INV-L antenna wire 30m above the ground. My average ERP estimate 
is 2.5 mW on that  frequency (average estimate, not average ERP ;-) ).

At the beginning there were frequency stability problems on the RX 
site 
but since the 21st of March the system was running well and stable. So 
we could observe a growing SNR during certain times within the stacked 
files.

We ended up stacking 13 daily transmissions into one file to analyse. 
I 
build a simple script in vlfrx tools to produce a set of data which 
was 
plotted in Excel. Here is the latest plot: 
http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/VLF/DL_VK7_17470.png

The curves show the SNR of the carrier for different start times and 
durations. The best SNR (12.70 dB in my stack) is obtained when 
starting 
at 19:20 UTC and watching the signal in 93 uHz, i.e. 3 hours.

After reaching about 12 dB SNR it became clear that this will become a 
successful detection. So i informed Paul Nicholson to evaluate the 
files 
and asked for a critical comment regarding the significance. He used 
his 
new fast PC to run a number of permutations of the files to produce an 
even better SNR, by dropping a few days which do not contribute 
positively to the stack. In the end we ended up at > 14 dB SNR and 
found 
the strongest peak of the file(s) exactly on the expected frequency.

I leave it to Paul to present the best spectrum peak and comment 
further 
on the statistical significance of the signal.

BTW this is the path: http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=QE37PD&from=JN49IK00WD

My thanks and congratulations go to Edgar J.T. for the successful 
carrier detection and the permanent available RX system, as well as 
for 
daily providing of the txt files containing the FFT data. Oh and not 
to 
forget about the patience :-)
Also thanks to Markus and Paul for the discussion and support in the 
background. And not to forget about DL4YHF for developing SpecLab, 
which 
is a part of most of these achievements.

The boundary of the garden fence has been pushed a little bit more 
these 
days!

73, Stefan