Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sBCBl82s009422 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:47:08 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XzOax-0001Fw-Os for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:41:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XzOax-0001Fn-Ce for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:41:15 +0000 Received: from rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.178]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XzOav-0007wG-GX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:41:14 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090204.548AD458.004D,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=40/50,refid=2.7.2:2014.12.7.160622:17:40.733,ip=81.155.177.209,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE, __HAS_HTML, HTML_NO_HTTP, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[209.177.155.81.fur], HTML_50_70, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, REFERENCES X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (81.155.177.209) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 54822EC700CF1BBF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:41:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1418384473; bh=xWjjcV5uMe9nmpK+u6bL6NDuMAmcQgnrFchiCYs5XqY=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=PP8aNLM0cQmCr8O6udPjMpPeiANao/pWZHW1vbrCffa/Bgy4jdKoUE0luRhWaaiioe0wRkDZHrjy+B1IVn1IYRqaCHdZCTDtnNuf5Utj6UCK48zpPS7lbtwEe5bBmlggqgBaGG1wUtLYqa62SApsAobKFC3H8GHPxgjQyXOCHbw= Message-ID: <1613EA9DB9104AF598F748E9990C7140@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <548A2729.6090304@virginbroadband.com.au> <548A4825.2000009@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:41:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: Re: LF: Re: DCF39 propagation Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01D01600.862A13E0" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1465 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01D01600.862A13E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Edgar this is alwaysa difficult call, unless you have some form of = signal in the waterfall that is really constant and able to be used as a = "calibration"/confidence boost. I remember collecing data from Brian in = Porto Portugal and he had an unidentified constant signal (no diurnal = variation) .We eventually decided it must be a harmonic of a telecom = system 8kHz clock. It was very good for highlighting a fault on the = antenna or receiver system over several years of data collection. Keep up the good work Best Wishes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: edgar=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 1:43 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: DCF39 propagation Hi Alan, Thank you for the link. It just must have been that the weather settled down after a noisy = period. It has been very noisy due to storm activity in New South Wales, and = out to sea there. Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01D01600.862A13E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Edgar this is alwaysa difficult = call, unless you=20 have some form of signal in the waterfall that is really constant and = able to be=20 used as a "calibration"/confidence boost. I remember collecing data from = Brian=20 in Porto Portugal and he had an unidentified constant signal (no diurnal = variation) .We eventually decided it must be a harmonic of a telecom = system 8kHz=20 clock. It was very good for highlighting a fault on the antenna or = receiver=20 system over several years of data collection.
 
Keep up the good work
Best Wishes
Alan
G3NYK
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 edgar
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 = 1:43=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: DCF39=20 propagation

Hi Alan,

Thank you for the=20 link.

It just must have been that the weather settled down = after a=20 noisy period.

It has been very noisy due to storm activity in = New South=20 Wales, and out to sea there.

Regards, Edgar
Moonah,=20 Tasmania.
 ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01D01600.862A13E0--