Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBTJZ7pO010934 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:35:09 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eV0N2-0000pm-59 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:31:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eV0N1-0000pY-GH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:31:07 +0000 Received: from smtp1web.tin.it ([212.216.176.195]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eV0Mx-0004np-M9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:31:06 +0000 Received: from feu5 (10.192.64.15) by smtp1web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 59FB431A014CA6C9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:31:03 +0100 Received: from (87.14.213.37) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:31:03 +0100 Message-ID: <160a3c19e03.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:31:03 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 87.14.213.37 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ouch.... what a misunderstandg hihi So you made exactly what I was thinking a good idea ;-) HNY ----Messaggio originale---- Da: 29-dic-2017 20.13 A: Ogg: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: R: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ouch.... what a misunderstandg hihi So you made exactly what I was thinking a good idea ;-) HNY ----Messaggio originale---- Da: selberdenken@posteo.de Data: 29-dic-2017 20.13 A: Ogg: Re: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... Hello Marco, Am 29.12.2017 19:40, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > Hi Stefan, > > just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on > the spectrum? > I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per > day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is > displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started > a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :- > | > The trace you saw on the DL0AO site was the carrier which was transmitted between my EbNaut transmissions. I simply let the TX run all the time, several days. The message is between the carriers and invisible at DL0AO. 73, Stefan