Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBTIiq5I010789 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:44:53 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eUzaJ-0000L2-39 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:40:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eUzaI-0000Kt-IN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:40:46 +0000 Received: from smtp1web.tin.it ([212.216.176.195]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eUzaF-0004U4-Sm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:40:45 +0000 Received: from feu3 (10.192.64.13) by smtp1web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 59FB431A014C799E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:40:39 +0100 Received: from (87.14.213.37) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:40:39 +0100 Message-ID: <160a3937bdc.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:40:39 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 87.14.213.37 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on the spectrum? I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :- | [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de Subject: R: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Stefan, just a quick question ;-) does the used code such a big difference on the spectrum? I mean during this week you transmitted 7 times (one per day) a message (not decoded neither seen from my side :-( ) which is displayed on the DL0AO grabber like a plain carrier, today you started a longer message and no sign appears.. I cannot understand the reason :- | By the way now which is the right moment on LF/MF I guess I have a faulty impedance transformer on the MF TX antenna and 1 hour ago while testing new transformers to replace the faulty one the MF/LF medium power TX went in short and either one or both FET joined the others in the FET Vahlalla.. RIP 73 Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: vlf0403@abelian.org Data: 29-dic-2017 17.55 A: Ogg: Re: VLF: Finally back on the 58 km band... Stefan wrote: > For this night, i run a short test message, ... > f = 5170.1000 Hz > Start time: 28.Dec.2017 18:30:00 UTC > Symbol period: 90 s > Characters: 1 > CRC bits: 3 > Coding 16K21A > Can someone confirm that the message run as expected? Todmorden (881 km) ------------------ Eb/N0 +12.1 dB phase 50.3 *Decoded* Bielefeld (303.8 km) -------------------- Eb/N0 +19.0 dB phase -51.9 *Decoded* Cumiana (504.6 km) ------------------ Eb/N0 +3.0 dB phase 171.0 *Decoded* Warsaw (919.3 km) ----------------- Eb/N0 +0.2 dB phase -10.4 *Decoded* All decodes at rank 0. > The message was 'R', if i remember correctly :-) Correct! -- Paul Nicholson --