Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBDIo3wg002480 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:50:04 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ePBzM-0005Fq-Ms for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:42:40 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ePBzH-0005Fh-3d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:42:35 +0000 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ePBzD-0008Hb-K9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:42:33 +0000 Received: from feu4 (10.192.64.14) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5A01CEF700C1E6F2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:42:28 +0100 Received: from (82.56.138.65) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:42:28 +0100 Message-ID: <160512f6570.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:42:28 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 82.56.138.65 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul... I'm simply astonished... the new receiver and the new site are really wonderful! Nice stuff! In the mean time I'm struggling because cannot detect any signal from Stefan or Riccardo.. :-(((( Again compliments Paul! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: URI host has a public dotted-decimal IPv4 address X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: R: Re: R: LF: Another carrier test at 8270.00332 from JN64bw Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul... I'm simply astonished... the new receiver and the new site are really wonderful! Nice stuff! In the mean time I'm struggling because cannot detect any signal from Stefan or Riccardo.. :-(((( Again compliments Paul! 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: vlf0403@abelian.org Data: 13-dic-2017 12.21 A: Ogg: Re: R: LF: Another carrier test at 8270.00332 from JN64bw Riccardo wrote: > QRG: 8270.00332 Came through quite nicely after midnight. Noise wasn't so bad last night. http://78.46.38.217/fbins3.html#p=1513155600&b=105&s=fd&m=fb&w=r&h=42&z1=0.35&z2=0.58&c=1 Was expecting 160 degrees. Switch to cardioid and draw a box around the trace to measure. Now I check my database, I had the wrong longitude. The distance is 1412.5 km and bearing 127.8 degrees. That's a bit better but still the spectrogram is showing something like 100 degrees. At that distance, a very good signal! -- Paul Nicholson --