Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v53H3OhY018320 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 19:03:26 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dHCOa-0007xa-Vm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:59:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dHCOa-0007xR-JQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:59:24 +0100 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dHCOX-0005AE-MG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:59:23 +0100 Received: from feu4 (10.192.64.14) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5822EBD203B2BB0F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:59:20 +0200 Received: from (80.182.160.35) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:59:20 +0200 Message-ID: <15c6ee59c21.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:59:20 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 80.182.160.35 X-Scan-Signature: 17343f7e400f1005b5081acbd4115359 Subject: R: Re: LF: For today the FETs survived... - not enough gate voltage? Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lipkowski.org id v53H3OhY018320 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11870 Thank you Marcus: haahaa also you kept in council :-) After fighting to place the oscillo probes on the gates which are a bit hidden... (this could be an improvement area...) the square wave is swinging from -5 to +8V with respect to ground. please don't ask me to measure between source and gate! ;-) So it should be enough to switch the IRF460As Marco ----Messaggio originale---- Da: andy.g4jnt@gmail.com Data: 3-giu-2017 18.28 A: Ogg: Re: LF: For today the FETs survived... - not enough gate voltage? Interesting thought. Checked my own design (the QEX article is the only remaining documentation!) and checked I also have a 1:1+1 driver transformer. But I do use a 15V rail for the driver, so +/- 7.5V which is a bit more than Marco's But never considered that ... Andy G4JNT On 3 June 2017 at 17:13, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Marco, > > looking at your schematic, I think the gate drive may be too low. Ideally > the driver will make 12 V peak-peak, or +-6V at the gate (probably slightly > less in reality, e.g. 5 V). This may not be enough to turn the FETs fully > on. So when increasing the drain suppy voltage beyond a certain limit, they > will go out of saturation and limit the available output current. In that > case you won't get more output power but only much more dissipation. Also > the output impedance will go from low (voltage-source) to high > (current-source), which could explain the changing frequency response. > > I would recommend to double the turns ratio of the gate transformer (e.g. > 10:20:20). > > 73, Markus (DF6NM) > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: marcocadeddu > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Sa, 3. Jun 2017 16:46 > Betreff: R: Re: R: Re: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... > > Hi Stefan, > > and thank you :-) so you have too something to mumble while sending > VLF SMS ;-) > There is nothing really new.. I started from an avalable > chassis with on board a PS giving 180Vdc (1200W) and assembled the > Andy's half bridge 700W switching PA and before give it the full power > I'm checking with lower DC supply. Attached you see the schematic with > some change at the moment.. > The output xfmr has 7T/19T, the coil of the guard circuit is not > connected (now is in serie with L2) and the resonating caps now are > 5x1000pF in parallel. > The aim is finally with 180Vdc of supply have an output of 0,5÷1kW > but.... as you probably red in the previous messages, from 10 to 30Vdc > the PA runs, at low power of course (up to 15W), and complies the > calculations; with supply between 30 and 50 Vdc the output go down to a > couple of W. > I made several trials it the last days, changing the core of the xfmr, > the turn ratio, the kind of capacitators but nothing changes (or at > least the change are within a fraction of dB). > > that's the sad history Stefan... > All thoughts and suggestions are welcome! (including go to fish ;-)) ) > Marco > > ... > >