Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v4GIEjxo000757 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 20:14:46 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dAgvV-0005Tq-99 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 19:10:29 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dAgvQ-0005Th-L6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 19:10:24 +0100 Received: from smtp3web.tin.it ([212.216.176.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dAgvN-000579-5d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 19:10:23 +0100 Received: from feu5 (10.192.64.15) by smtp3web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 583FEE8C02D2F824 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 May 2017 20:10:18 +0200 Received: from (79.31.170.27) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Tue, 16 May 2017 19:40:31 +0200 Message-ID: <15c1258d892.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 19:40:31 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 79.31.170.27 X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Subject: R: Re: R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lipkowski.org id v4GIEjxo000757 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11704 Hello Chris, happy to read that increasing the turn number you can make the life easier to the toroids ;-) (the FETs also enjoy hi). I'm not a professional, but using the formula and taking care of respect of the Bmax of 0.1T, I had (up o now) no problems with xformers. Since some years I switched to Epikote forms wich are looking better for low frequencies (and here in Italy are also cheaper of Amidon cores). In the weekend I should start some trials with simil Decca approach: the PS at 180Vdc is already running and could be later transformed in direct rectification of the main aiming to 1kW which should then allow to reach the 1W. Still running 250 or 20W on LF with satisfactory resoult considering the city antenna and the season :-) 73, Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: dead.fets@gmail.com Data: 16-mag-2017 17.29 A: Ogg: Re: R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited Hello Marco, 16 May 2017 Good to hear from you, thanks for the reply. I have remade the combiner's output transformer using 3 stacked 78 material toroids of the same size, and wound it with 180 strand speaker wire, pure copper, with an inner conductor of about 2mm diamter. I wound 3 times as many turns, 15 on the primary, 21 turns on the secondary. It now runs about 40 degrees Celcius with no fan cooling, and the drain wave forms are a lot less spiky. I saw fair-Rite now list a 98 compound, and it's advertised as a big improvement for the frequency than the 78 material, but there's an error on their web site and 98 compound is not available in toroidal form, unfortunately. I did see this beast in 78 compound though, a lot bigger than the FT-240 cores, and wondered if the fairly high cost is worth it? http://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/ferrite-rings/4956317/ Thanks again! > Chris, > I guess there is a little misstyping in the calculation performed from > Clemens on the DJ5IL tool.... > he entered 2.5 instead of 25 in the impedance box: the primary > winding after the combiner should work on 25 ohms. If you enter 25 ohm > the flux rise a lot beyond the saturation of the 3 stacked cores and > therefore they have all the rights to warmup! > On the other hand if you apply the Bmax formula given from Andy, the 3 > stacked cores have A of 471mm² > and with 2kW of power on 25 ohms the minimum number of turns on the > primary should be 8 not 5. > So one more turn to keep B below 0,1T and you should run more > confortable with N1/N2=9/13 > 73 de Marco, IK1HSS -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com