Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v1CAJS79022118 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:19:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ccr73-0001Q6-Ph for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:10:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ccr6t-0001Pv-Cp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:10:23 +0000 Received: from smtp2web.tin.it ([212.216.176.236]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ccr6q-0006aV-Lf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:10:22 +0000 Received: from feu3 (10.192.64.13) by smtp2web.tin.it (8.6.060.43) id 5822EBD201A6A8DF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:10:17 +0100 Received: from (95.251.132.134) by wmlighttin.pc.tim.it; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:10:17 +0100 Message-ID: <15a31cd3aae.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:10:17 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 95.251.132.134 X-Scan-Signature: d7fcd9b75df8d1b09ddef9df028bd9ae Subject: R: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10568 Hi Stefan, where do you qsy next? :-) the dreamer band is now no longer a dream ;- ) are you winding a new coil for 77 Hz band? gosh.. 3800 km of wavelenght! Leaving the jokes .. again compliments for the new achievement, although on the theory there is nothing new I can't avoid to be still fascinated from the fact that a so small change in one place can induce a detectable change so far away... it is almost like the butterfly from the Amazonic forest... Keep on Stefan we are awaiting for a new detection in a more remote place, anybody 10 lambda away listening? 73 Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: selberdenken@posteo.de Data: 11-feb-2017 23.28 A: Cc: "Renato Romero" Ogg: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not? Hi Markus, Paul, Eddie, Marco, Jim, Renato, thanks for the positive feedback. Am 11.02.2017 15:22, schrieb g3zjo: > > I am convinced, but do it again. > Yes, i will do it again on another frequency. Hopefully the QRN stays low for some time longer. Or i have to add more power! Hmmm, critical, maybe. Am 11.02.2017 16:55, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > 2970 is the strongest line. At least 3 sigma, maybe 4, > depending on how you treat the lumpy floor. A physicist > would insist on 5 sigma but the fact that the peak is > at exactly the right frequency is significant in itself. > > Markus just wrote: > > > In my humble opinion, this is clearly a successful > > detection. > > I was doubtful looking at the spectrogram but having > plotted the pixels I am convinced. > > Best I can get in Todmorden is 2 and a bit sigma > using just the daytime signal in 3.9 uHz. Not > significant at all. Would need at least another 7 > days of transmission. How does that peak look so far, in a spectrum? What happens if you put day and night together, maybe with some phase correction? 73, Stefan