Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 22:02:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Hollander <mrsocion@aol.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Message-ID: <1597669195.6418012.1552860156710@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <2307751552825928@myt4-ea6eba8eca77.qloud-c.yandex.net>
References: <843821552738628@iva3-294f9af87d55.qloud-c.yandex.net> <249385912.5979949.1552750979922@mail.yahoo.com> <2307751552825928@myt4-ea6eba8eca77.qloud-c.yandex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_6418011_1177710368.1552860156708"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

------=_Part_6418011_1177710368.1552860156708
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Roman,=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0Yes, I wonder how to do it in software.=C2=A0 A=
s you know, a coherer has a large number of particles that statistically=C2=
=A0become more closely packed and connective in response to=C2=A0RF voltage=
 or current applied to them.=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0Since software defined radio=
s have replaced many functions in short wave receivers with software on a c=
omputer, why not envisage some software virtualization of the coherer.=C2=
=A0 We've been trained to think a coherer is a quaint relic of the first da=
ys of radio.=C2=A0=C2=A0 But what truly are the performance limits of the c=
oherer in principle and what improvements starting from the coherer concept=
 might actualize advances or technological alternatives=C2=A0in radio?=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Perhaps ultimately the answer is "None",=C2=A0 but has=C2=A0=
 the question even been probed.=C2=A0I recognize most of us may not be in a=
 position to inquire into the matter, but I want to put the topic forward.=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 If there's any group that=C2=A0includes=C2=A0someone with=C2=
=A0the background and interests=C2=A0to potentially=C2=A0think through this=
 software challenge,=C2=A0they're probably in=C2=A0this=C2=A0LF/VLF/ULF/SLF=
/ELF group now or in the future!=C2=A0TU & 73, Jim H=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 W5ES=
T=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0-----Original Message-----
From: Roman <rw3adb@YANDEX.ru>
To: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sun, Mar 17, 2019 7:34 am
Subject: Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday

Hi Jim!

PSE more info about your software, OM!
VY interesting.

> FB, Roman. BTW, I've wondered how one could write radio detection softwar=
e to act like a coherer and improve upon its principle. The software would =
be a "swarm detector" working on the collective interaction of many element=
al pieces or software elements. 73, Jim H W5EST
--=20
73!
Roman, RW3ADB


------=_Part_6418011_1177710368.1552860156708
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<font color='black' size='2' face='Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif'>
<div>Hi Roman,&nbsp;&nbsp; </div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>Yes, I wonder how to do it in software.&nbsp; As you know, a coherer has a large number of particles that statistically&nbsp;become more closely packed and connective in response to&nbsp;RF voltage or current applied to them.&nbsp;&nbsp; </div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>Since software defined radios have replaced many functions in short wave receivers with software on a computer, why not envisage some software virtualization of the coherer.&nbsp; We've been trained to think a coherer is a quaint relic of the first days of radio.&nbsp;&nbsp; But what truly are the performance limits of the coherer in principle and what improvements starting from the coherer concept might actualize advances or technological alternatives&nbsp;in radio?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Perhaps ultimately the answer is "None",&nbsp; but has&nbsp; the question even been probed.</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>I recognize most of us may not be in a position to inquire into the matter, but I want to put the topic forward.&nbsp;&nbsp; If there's any group that&nbsp;includes&nbsp;someone with&nbsp;the background and interests&nbsp;to potentially&nbsp;think through this software challenge,&nbsp;they're probably in&nbsp;this&nbsp;LF/VLF/ULF/SLF/ELF group now or in the future!</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>TU &amp; 73, Jim H&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; W5EST&nbsp;</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div style="color: black; font-family: arial,helvetica; font-size: 10pt;">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Roman &lt;rw3adb@YANDEX.ru&gt;<br>
To: rsgb_lf_group &lt;rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org&gt;<br>
Sent: Sun, Mar 17, 2019 7:34 am<br>
Subject: Re: LF: 160 years of Popov birthday<br>
<br>

<div dir="ltr">Hi Jim!<br clear="none"><br clear="none">PSE more info about your software, OM!<br clear="none">VY interesting.
<div class="yqt2192406977" id="yqtfd07414"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">&gt; FB, Roman. BTW, I've wondered how one could write radio detection software to act like a coherer and improve upon its principle. The software would be a "swarm detector" working on the collective interaction of many elemental pieces or software elements. 73, Jim H W5EST<br clear="none">-- <br clear="none">73!</div>
<br clear="none">Roman, RW3ADB
<div class="yqt2192406977" id="yqtfd00255"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div>
</div>
</div>
</font>
------=_Part_6418011_1177710368.1552860156708--