Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x49EufHP023844 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:56:42 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hOkLN-00039z-3O for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 15:48:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hOkL1-00039q-1J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 15:47:59 +0100 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hOkKw-0006gc-Sa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 15:47:57 +0100 Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id o4so3464898wra.3 for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 07:47:54 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p7NBlcp4bpCI61PVw8Iy2aVi2MMYoiJeEC7dSHT1uAA=; b=PV8NXzoG3N3qtBI0GxEvaGLpXpt8I+uDpujzYdt4Db4ZICZZBwh6Ay1x+otEkFAHFT kyd1fB+AABoAsTV5CC11G6OmrvZxSJtT8wkNQBuZedVczHNfunNPUMq32ReFBWQOAHxF OGW/h7kk/yJ4VxJOX0V+Re8BkmAOXjGhYlJZjaDwd5r/Y8kX7cxcPT4mHbSvAIaQAymn cBolk8NVx0PN0yA+8TIyM82ipTK12bA24B/6krI8ydLZ1anRztbN3WP99yWfRe5aH+Oj kumtIDAd5hqCyjZvck7JfkCsqluZbmHIauQQrGsgZDEiz7scnBwIbTkUgjbfSNpHEudi f5qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p7NBlcp4bpCI61PVw8Iy2aVi2MMYoiJeEC7dSHT1uAA=; b=GduGagbiuWSQBtHC5ye5Njb72V5wFzmE8Zx/6u62Jc6fgNIbvXdM+B4QpuxIgzL7qf tCiuZP3awdC2Bzhnto+6UUPkJNOW1WBG3va4W+q+Y3CZ/DsJ1JOvt816qum76N8yw4VH 3sBN7AaMghuX+XjJfZ6dYbbtsTFK5NkKBEkTzP1uV6e8YBWaTJTLl5YhDhoN9driR2M+ BTXKtm8sVSVBNRbQ2KdzkS+NSu42ZTeQN6A0GslJSgMFuYy4aWKuUARYa+7qKgIcLcNl qe5QdsY5wN0XWnpESJzXysBAy7M2i0L0x8c2HVvcq4GKgJc//OcpcNEHfeGiz+bg3pDI DKLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvEboZqYB1bqTqqvddAHjCNwQ7KHB5s/NvDh4quYfmyXfm+U0M 8Y0d4WigaUt3LcT6Yb5vbqGjPXzDH18= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxykFx8941p1lzCXjUa6KCpJWJBM8E/0vA95kzOG/wSPO6eWdWBs40GjVLwLRT6bjtSrHbJLQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8bc5:: with SMTP id w5mr3430055wra.226.1557413273667; Thu, 09 May 2019 07:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v184sm3687530wma.6.2019.05.09.07.47.50 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 May 2019 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 15:47:49 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1562754668.20190509154749@gmail.com> To: DK7FC In-Reply-To: <5CD42C82.80906@posteo.de> References: <477297345.20190414143742@gmail.com> <5CB35457.9060303@posteo.de> <592014641.20190414170848@gmail.com> <5CB37097.90104@posteo.de> <853391954.20190509134230@gmail.com> <5CD42C82.80906@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, Thanks, ordered 3, so get free shipping, it was cheaper than ordering 2 and paying shipping :) Thursday, May 9, 2019, 2:34:58 PM, you wrote: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:432 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-Scan-Signature: ce0e5a4ae990e5a63db3ab7aea21191b Subject: Re: LF: Another impedance matching question. Paul's audio amps. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x49EufHP023844 Hello Stefan, Thanks, ordered 3, so get free shipping, it was cheaper than ordering 2 and paying shipping :) Thursday, May 9, 2019, 2:34:58 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > I would not recommend the one you selected because it has an unnecessary > large inner diameter and a lower height, thus a lower AL value. > I think this is the same one that i recommended from Bürklin: > https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/EPCOS-TDK/B64290A0699X830?qs=sGAEpiMZZMs2JV%252BnT%2FvX8Df1W1GtRs010YpcsJh6dvk%3D > It is also cheaper. > There are other materials available, such as T65, T38, T37, offering a > higher AL value. Maybe these are even more suitable at that sort of > frequency but i didn't spend too much time to select the best core for > each frequency. I use the N30 material from 1 kHz to MF at high power ( >> 1 kW for one core) without problems. So this is what i recommend. It > will work. > 73, Stefan > PS: If you want to bridge one of Paul's 2x 7.2 kW amps, you may need two > of them ;-) > PPS: You may want to build two orthogonal ground loops then, one per > channel. With SpecLab you can then drive each channel separately and so > you can build a software rotatable loop by aligning the phase between > the channels, while staying into the shack when its cold and/or rainy :-) > Am 09.05.2019 14:42, schrieb Chris Wilson: >> >> Hello Stefan, >> >> I am now on to building a matching transformer but it seems Buerklin >> have a minimum order of 60 units! I have found this bigger core at >> Mouser, could I use that instead please? >> >> https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/EPCOS-TDK/B64290L0730X830?qs=4l9S5vBWkUJtsO6ZFRCS4g%3D%3D >> -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com