Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v5ADSEXU022874 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 15:28:16 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dJgHs-0003kT-OQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:18:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dJgHs-0003kK-1T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:18:44 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dJgHo-0007Ub-8t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:18:42 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id v104so56159630wrb.0 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 06:18:39 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4dOQ7y4hoPW+fJ34gzq35WQ2fB9QCxowEx5pfWBh1cQ=; b=qeFhm7yuU8aabwI1AEH4bo49hH5RbHoc7Znxrlk9QUHJHxuMgXe9rXAHHVwxrx6KjU QYrRUkBnkJ20XRabVRvfEtOUy3tgh+psiGYEHAsQj4BtpAct/jdGOHD4tA/rkNJo2IUc 8OLDD5jaz6mzDvxzFOgU37/yFlryqUmHSNS4rm5mf2jcG0SDB+hWLoXpbcrEhLritcmM l4Bvh8OiFl/CdMHbyHvVffzcteD8us7f98P40GSvUBzlTM7XDrw+Kqvu7WIK1NBSxBbu tUYd2FPdBUY1DYBVO6BIjTElP+U076GpcBbAoBYG9CkUUt8zUN5FLvyKNYpaEt8iKCBu I/qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4dOQ7y4hoPW+fJ34gzq35WQ2fB9QCxowEx5pfWBh1cQ=; b=B0wQmIh9IFrCpj/uSSOlS7i0M3kzv/g+wrhKxLRZXd00vNS0fdksj4f6YHXIrNt7rb jkBntjEPqpdIpNNsX8oFr6ucEl2BZhUFGamWehSt8F65ooUhvHtA5Oh4eFNMQqqva5sA cMXb3tSDWCy4Vj2CbxozK/3accEV9xXLTo7w6lsDsuJld3jAdMeso3hFdKx5UWooI1cb tqWwVIZIO3NDFXkJRKin5qypTG74juFxYzMFAaAiNfxGzwNKKavVt3d4FjrMBZMvslsi /0mM3lIctI/VVTPFL2eWI8alU4JX6zmeFpfqVRuKKfTiNNA8jGP1qs5AdV18851ixpsK ZPGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOx3Hw2LDGA1FtVK4F3Q6WVwHo60KAWAC8/S0quIniL5T2pX9mQk QriHSirgUhvgKAnS X-Received: by 10.28.19.11 with SMTP id 11mr2844047wmt.123.1497100718083; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm3173711wmd.16.2017.06.10.06.18.37 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 10 Jun 2017 06:18:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Wilson X-Google-Original-From: Chris Wilson Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:18:36 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1557864643.20170610141836@gmail.com> To: Lawrence Galea In-Reply-To: References: <953388818.20170606163952@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: LF: Decoupling linear PSU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11937 Hello Lawrence, Sorry for late reply, work and a dodgy e-mail service from something gone wrong at my ISP. I haven't as yet tried any caps on the LV output terminals, would 1uF ceramics be appropriate? The PSU has 0.1uF and a huge choke on the mains input, please see http://www.gatesgarth.com/H60001.jpg for schematic. I have also discovered a Schmidtt NAND IC has, by design, some floating inputs, one goes to a long un-terminated trace on a PCB, I think some pull up resistors might be appropriate, the device is part of the SCR secondary voltage control keeping the pass transistor drop voltage around 8.5V, until it has one of its fits :) Thanks for the advice. Wednesday, June 7, 2017, 8:12:15 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > Did you Try capacitors across the supply lines right at the output > connectors and also from both + and - to earth? > Did you try the same at the mains input with suitable voltage rating? > Regards > Lawrence > On 6/6/17, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Hello LF'ers, >> >> I have had a few issues with my lovely old Farnell H60/50 linear >> bench power supply. It'll do 60V @ 50A but I suspect it's last couple >> of uncontrolled output voltage failures may have been caused by RF >> getting into it, maybe up the output leads, maybe elsewhere. The >> manual makes mention of using caps of "a suitable value" across the >> output, or each output pin to ground, when used to power "transient >> loads" ; it's far from clear what's meant. The -ve floats relative to >> chassis ground. What do people recommend as a means of stopping RF >> getting in via the + and - output leads please? >> >> It has SCR control on the transformers primary to keep the voltage >> drop across the huge pass transistor tunnel down to around 8V, this >> seems to go haywire at random times when powering my TX, and the >> 2N3055's don't like 103V into them. Worst case scenario should be >> 73V, but I am pretty sure SCR control fails and the secondary rises >> to its full potential. Thanks. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com >> >> >> -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com