Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v5EGEeKZ013136 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:14:41 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dLAk9-0006ib-U9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:02:05 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dLAk9-0006iS-2N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:02:05 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dLAk6-0006te-9W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:02:03 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r103so4478799wrb.0 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:02:01 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mWIQz6xLdYIuMw+VlwbjdmV9NrCh5tAxWcpKUQZQmCs=; b=R9+u2LVnOvvOdUos8IbGB3zuTlWm1Fu3Jd+cjDC44i8X791dYZXWXpRvWLjpxUrzgQ 6Kv5kCqoZSsUX0orWpNWC5iiH/cno0BmqnNt5Wcc6PT+B2RiudiuUnx0gO3ZIz14JjAL cmSR9rR1G5SrZLOzdUG1eN3aIEZfavAB5ik1fAtN/+JC1hXQ1xWHSz1v2AZUZrIg9YvW UA9s4o553WIgJqvME+cdAkIx0nAF6r8Z1CwcsjaN18ffAjnOMkmOaPPDGS8+8P7tk79K A1Jd4mvMdNV4a6lwNb6QfDdVJEfZ5l+1JItWd/ilp3n++ur0u7otsZ7ujK1SQF5bimNb MmsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mWIQz6xLdYIuMw+VlwbjdmV9NrCh5tAxWcpKUQZQmCs=; b=NQ7cIUQJVz+faQFtgQt6LYBaEjCeWeUDLObcFBea6ZzYdZ8yfWZRhlCGUfJf7UNlKg w04teXvmXH6I9+RNjo7jXcfRY9s+D+IGJ0P15A5R8ezfCZe9s/99Hds6aozDaLsQBEVo P9+v29cRkDbpFTdB+UnZx3XUnzlQ9RKcSP/mykxQTZqlTMPnKv+woOTLBFsbxpO3yaTm NB9CioLped4NtwsaBARzW5nWyM1bFSx+2E0w5h5FOvspBiUgvU7V0ZFbgC4ZxTJTrCTh s10l0s8tfMHL//eDaRX7/qbJLEpovbTJveGf83Gx4hLjIHfk1N9cgRHoCmc7NBbP0eOB 7t6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyG/Eai3KsbwcoTbxfOw+GBECmWK0XVGy3OD7R2MaPDj3uSbgPp akruC36EONV++SxT X-Received: by 10.28.9.142 with SMTP id 136mr480895wmj.91.1497456120385; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 49sm485404wrz.8.2017.06.14.09.01.59 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:01:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Wilson X-Google-Original-From: Chris Wilson Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:01:58 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1552974757.20170614170158@gmail.com> To: DK7FC In-Reply-To: <59400441.7030008@posteo.de> References: <907292116.20170613161717@gmail.com> <59400441.7030008@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: Scopemeter current reading question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11977 Hello DK7FC, I have never tried JT9, but it appears my U3S exciter covers that mode. What time span (there's JT9-2 upwards it seems), and what frequency is appropriate? I am happy to give it a shot! Tuesday, June 13, 2017, 4:26:57 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > The waveform should look like a pure sine wave. Then it would say > nothing but "it's all right, pse QRO!". > Maybe i misunderstand the question. > BTW you are QRV in WSPR. Are you also ready for JT9? > 73, Stefan -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com