Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0EMHQi9024943 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:17:27 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gjATD-0005xo-Fp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:12:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gjASm-0005xd-RM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:12:08 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:129]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gjASj-0007Jx-2a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:12:06 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 082E6120331.A7DA8 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082E6120331 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:12:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX23.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx23.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC52A40CE; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:12:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX23.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:12:00 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:12:00 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb-lf-group@groups.io" , "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" , "600MRG@mailman.qth.net" <600MRG@mailman.qth.net>, "paul@n1bug.com" Thread-Topic: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Thread-Index: AQHUqoEjoc/dOnqlzUKYLoNbI+jA8KWsHfGbgADD6giAAWjwM4ABCyOD Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:12:00 +0000 Message-ID: <1547503919964.74015@kuleuven.be> References: <7c1d6628-d950-9548-995c-9ebc6039bfed@n1bug.com>,<1547326807839.95696@kuleuven.be>,<1547368931365.44144@kuleuven.be>,<1547446354524.51161@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1547446354524.51161@kuleuven.be> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, there was another (and even better) band opening after I left for work (6 UTC): 0550 -34 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0710 -33 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0730 -29 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0750 -33 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:129 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: d0d76c369792b807e0925732d18ad9b1 Subject: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0EMHQi9024943 Hello Paul, there was another (and even better) band opening after I left for work (6 UTC): 0550 -34 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0710 -33 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0730 -29 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0750 -33 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0100 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0120 -37 -0.9 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0540 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0640 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0700 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0720 -31 -0.9 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0740 -32 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0800 -36 -0.7 395 X VVV N1BUG X Will anybody be transmitting JT9-5 and/or JT9-10 on 136kHz tonight? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: Rik Strobbe Verzonden: maandag 14 januari 2019 7:12 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net; paul@n1bug.com Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Hello Paul, far less than the previous night: 0550 -34 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 0100 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0120 -37 -0.9 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0540 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: Rik Strobbe Verzonden: zondag 13 januari 2019 9:42 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net; paul@n1bug.com Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Hello Paul, Alex, below my overnight JT9-10 copies . Not a single copy in JT9-5. The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T 2240 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 2250 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 2300 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0010 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0020 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0040 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0100 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0110 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0120 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0130 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0140 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0140 -34 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0150 -34 -0.4 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0200 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0200 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0210 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0220 -29 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0220 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0230 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0240 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0240 -37 -0.7 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0300 -31 -0.6 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0300 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0310 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0320 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0320 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0330 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0340 -36 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0350 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF 0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0640 -31 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0700 -32 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0720 -30 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0740 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 0800 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X ________________________________________ Van: Rik Strobbe Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 22:00 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net; paul@n1bug.com Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Hello Paul, I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning. In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km). 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: 600mrg-bounces@mailman.qth.net <600mrg-bounces@mailman.qth.net> namens N1BUG Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 15:14 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net Onderwerp: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to transmit on 2200m. I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial' plus 395 Hz audio). All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will provide the best comparison between the modes. If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run for at least two nights, maybe three. 73, Paul N1BUG ______________________________________________________________ 600MRG mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:600MRG@mailman.qth.net Message delivered to rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html