Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0DDFYkc015606 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:15:35 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gifXq-0007zR-Tv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:11:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gifWs-0007xv-Cf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:10:18 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit03.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gifWo-0003my-PP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:10:15 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 70E26120002.A4A32 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by rhcavuit03.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E26120002 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:10:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX23.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx23.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB4120006; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:10:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX26.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.61) by ICTS-S-EXMBX23.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:10:09 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX26.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:10:09 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:10:09 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb-lf-group@groups.io" , "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" , "600MRG@mailman.qth.net" <600MRG@mailman.qth.net> Thread-Topic: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Thread-Index: AQHUqoEjoc/dOnqlzUKYLoNbI+jA8KWsHfGbgADD6giAACVTgIAAJWlK Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:10:08 +0000 Message-ID: <1547385001218.71121@kuleuven.be> References: <7c1d6628-d950-9548-995c-9ebc6039bfed@n1bug.com> <1547326807839.95696@kuleuven.be> <1547368931365.44144@kuleuven.be>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Paul, all, JT9-5: my mistake! I was running SlowJT9 v0.9.12.5 for JT9-5 and that version will not decode below 400Hz. I should have known better ... I will install a second version of v0.9.14.0 (using the ZIP file) and runmonitor both JT9-5 and JT9-10 with v0.9.14.0. Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:136 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 0cdfd8d5ce44f1724c623c4ac9f44df6 Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0DDFYkc015606 Hello Paul, all, JT9-5: my mistake! I was running SlowJT9 v0.9.12.5 for JT9-5 and that version will not decode below 400Hz. I should have known better ... I will install a second version of v0.9.14.0 (using the ZIP file) and runmonitor both JT9-5 and JT9-10 with v0.9.14.0. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: rsgb-lf-group@groups.io namens N1BUG Verzonden: zondag 13 januari 2019 12:52 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net Onderwerp: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test Hello Rik, Thanks for this report. It is interesting you did not decode me on JT9-5 since some of the JT9-10 reports indicate the signal was strong enough. Perhaps just the timing of QSB. I did receive JT9-5 reports from other stations so I believe my transmissions were OK. The test will continue for two more nights if there are no equipment malfunctions. 73, Paul N1BUG On 1/13/19 3:42 AM, Rik Strobbe wrote: > Hello Paul, Alex, > > below my overnight JT9-10 copies . > Not a single copy in JT9-5. > The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > 2240 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 2250 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 2300 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0010 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0020 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0040 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0100 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0110 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0120 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0130 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0140 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0140 -34 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0150 -34 -0.4 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0200 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0200 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0210 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0220 -29 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0220 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0230 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0240 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0240 -37 -0.7 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0300 -31 -0.6 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0300 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0310 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0320 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0320 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0330 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0340 -36 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0350 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF > 0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0640 -31 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0700 -32 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0720 -30 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0740 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > 0800 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X > > ________________________________________ > Van: Rik Strobbe > Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 22:00 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net; paul@n1bug.com > Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test > > Hello Paul, > > I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning. > In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km). > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8481): https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/message/8481 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29062197/1555778 Group Owner: rsgb-lf-group+owner@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/leave/3440736/168031436/xyzzy [rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-