Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0D8rWSD014370
for <rlg@klubnl.pl>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:53:43 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1gibLi-0005RV-V3
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:30 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1gibLb-0005RM-5u
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:23 +0000
Received: from rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:137])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be>)
id 1gibLY-00039z-Ae
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:22 +0000
X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be
X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean
X-KULeuven-ID: E4BB4120009.A4CC5
X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33])
by rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BB4120009
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX19.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx19.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.50])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5C140B4;
Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by
ICTS-S-EXMBX19.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100
Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a])
by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi
id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:11 +0100
X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster
From: Rik Strobbe <rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>,
"rsgb-lf-group@groups.io" <rsgb-lf-group@groups.io>,
"Discussion of the
Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer@mailman.qth.net>,
"600MRG@mailman.qth.net" <600MRG@mailman.qth.net>,
"paul@n1bug.com"
<paul@n1bug.com>
Thread-Topic: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Thread-Index: AQHUqoEjoc/dOnqlzUKYLoNbI+jA8KWsHfGbgADD6gg=
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:42:11 +0000
Message-ID: <1547368931365.44144@kuleuven.be>
References: <7c1d6628-d950-9548-995c-9ebc6039bfed@n1bug.com>,<1547326807839.95696@kuleuven.be>
In-Reply-To: <1547326807839.95696@kuleuven.be>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: nl-BE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Hello Paul, Alex, below my overnight JT9-10 copies . Not a
single copy in JT9-5. The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in
broad daylight. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
[2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:137 listed in]
[list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4
Subject: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0D8rWSD014370
Hello Paul, Alex,
below my overnight JT9-10 copies .
Not a single copy in JT9-5.
The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight.
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
2240 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
2250 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
2300 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0010 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0020 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0040 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0100 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0110 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0120 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0130 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0140 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0140 -34 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0150 -34 -0.4 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0200 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0200 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0210 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0220 -29 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0220 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0230 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0240 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0240 -37 -0.7 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0300 -31 -0.6 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0300 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0310 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0320 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0320 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0330 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0340 -36 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0350 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0640 -31 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0700 -32 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0720 -30 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0740 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0800 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
________________________________________
Van: Rik Strobbe
Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 22:00
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net; paul@n1bug.com
Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Hello Paul,
I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning.
In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km).
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________________
Van: 600mrg-bounces@mailman.qth.net <600mrg-bounces@mailman.qth.net> namens N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 15:14
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group@groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG@mailman.qth.net
Onderwerp: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
transmit on 2200m.
I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
plus 395 Hz audio).
All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
provide the best comparison between the modes.
If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
for at least two nights, maybe three.
73,
Paul N1BUG
______________________________________________________________
600MRG mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:600MRG@mailman.qth.net
Message delivered to rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be
This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html