Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAKDq8np026241 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:52:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gP6Nk-0003Ac-Rj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:48:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gP6Nk-0003AT-Cg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:48:00 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:137]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gP6Nh-0006cT-Em for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:47:59 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 5E97E120009.A29FF X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by rhcavuit04.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E97E120009 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:47:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX22.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx22.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5606A40B5; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:47:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX22.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:47:49 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:47:50 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" , "600MRG@mailman.qth.net" <600MRG@mailman.qth.net> Thread-Topic: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.10) Thread-Index: AQHUgNRJUS44269IXEOMxQPDNE74vw== Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:47:50 +0000 Message-ID: <1542721669174.9290@kuleuven.be> References: <1541712573053.31739@kuleuven.be>,<1542362144885.30626@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1542362144885.30626@kuleuven.be> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dear all, I just uploaded a now beta-release of SlowJT9 (v0.9.10). The changes are Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [2a02:2c40:0:c0:0:0:25:137 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b42857a5fad6e32377447282c21f62b1 Subject: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.10) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_15427216691749290kuleuvenbe_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_15427216691749290kuleuvenbe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, I just uploaded a now beta-release of SlowJT9 (v0.9.10). The changes are - JT9-2 and JT9-5 parameters changed to the original ones. The slightly slo= wer baudrates make better advance of the transmission cycle. In theory this= should improve S/N by 0.46 dB for JT9-2 and 0.74 dB for JT9-5. Be aware that due to the baudrate changes there is NO BACKWARD COMPATIBILIT= Y for JT9-2 and JT9-5. In other words: JT9-2 and JT9-5 send with v0.9.10 cannot be decoded with pr= ior versions (v0.9.00 - v0.9.03) and vice versa. The JT9-1 mode however is still the same and can be sent / received with al= l versions (and is WSJT-X compatible). - JT9-10 mode (10 minute cycle) added, for the fearless. I briefly tested v?0.9.10 for in JT9-2 mode and it seems to decode (at leas= t) at the same level as for the previous versions. But to determine a diffe= rence of 0.4dB, more extensive tests are needed. The sole purpose of this version is to determine how JT9-2, and eventually = JT9-5, behave in relation to the previous versions, so we can decide wether= SlowJT9 will proceed with the original parameters (anno 2013) that imply a= n odd baudrate ratio between the JT9 submodes or my previous parameters, wi= th "round number" ratios. Therefore all test reports, remarks, suggestions and opinions are most welc= ome. For the same reason no other changes are applied. Whoever is interested can download the SlowJT9 installation file at http://= 472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe. For now only a Windows version of SlowJT9 is available. But as the used IDE= has cross platform facilities it should be possible to support other opera= ting systems as well in the future. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T --_000_15427216691749290kuleuvenbe_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear all,


I just uploaded a now beta-release of SlowJT9 (v0.9.10).

The changes are


JT9-2 and JT9-5 parameters changed to the original ones. The slight= ly slower baudrates make better advance of the transmission cycle. In theor= y this should improve S/N by 0.46 dB for JT9-2 and 0.74 dB for JT9-5.

Be aware that due to the baudrate changes there is NO BAC= KWARD COMPATIBILITY for JT9-2 and JT9-5. 
In other words: JT9-2 and JT9-5 send with v0.9.10 ca= nnot be decoded with prior versions (v0.9.00 - v0.9.03) and vice versa.

The JT9-1 mode however is still the same and can be sent = / received with all versions (and is WSJT-X compatible).


- JT9-10 mode (10 minute cycle) added, for the fearless.


I briefly tested v​0.9.10 for in JT9-2 mode and it = seems to decode (at least) at the same level as for the previous versi= ons. But to determine a difference of 0.4dB, more extensive tests are = needed.

The sole purpose of this version is to determine how JT9-2, and = eventually JT9-5, behave in relation to the previous versions, so= we can decide wether SlowJT9 will proceed with the original parameters&nbs= p;(anno 2013) that imply an odd baudrate ratio between the JT9 submodes or my previous parameters, with "round numbe= r" ratios. 

Therefore all test reports, remarks, suggestions and opinions&nb= sp;are most welcome.

For the same reason no other changes are applied.


Whoever is interested can download the SlowJT9 installation file&nb= sp;at http://4= 72khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe.


For now only a Windows version of SlowJT9 is available. But as= the used IDE has cross platform facilities it should be possible to suppor= t other operating systems as well in the future.


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T






--_000_15427216691749290kuleuvenbe_--