Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1DDDM1k015349 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:13:25 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1elaKM-0001oA-53 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:08:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1elaKL-0001o1-Mp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:08:53 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit03.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:136]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1elaKH-0004hS-GZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:08:52 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: AA859120330.A4BFD X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by rhcavuit03.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA859120330 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:08:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX20.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx20.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3562003B; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:08:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX20.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:08:42 +0100 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:08:42 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , "600MRG@mailman.qth.net" <600MRG@mailman.qth.net>, "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" Thread-Topic: [rsgb_lf_group] MF: EU<>NA last night Thread-Index: AQHTpMqUOhwNTGV5w0qEGU9hsHroCKOiTGbU Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:08:42 +0000 Message-ID: <1518527312066.15076@kuleuven.be> References: <9d0461bd-fc77-ef15-1c30-9c5f9341c2ad@n1bug.com> In-Reply-To: <9d0461bd-fc77-ef15-1c30-9c5f9341c2ad@n1bug.com> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, I had half a dozen good copies during your QSO with PA0A (congrats on that one) and later. I called you for about 45 minutes, meanwhile it was daylight here. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.1 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL's NS IP listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist [URIs: n1bug.com] 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8fff1948093e2e02df26fa392c066ea9 Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] MF: EU<>NA last night Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_151852731206615076kuleuvenbe_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,HTML_WEB_BUGS,PORN_4 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_151852731206615076kuleuvenbe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, I had half a dozen good copies during your QSO with PA0A (congrats on that = one) and later. I called you for about 45 minutes, meanwhile it was daylight here. I had a quick propagation check on WSPR and was decoded by VE9GJ. Not sure I will be QRV tonight or tomorrow morning, my antenna is behaving = strange (probably caused by my attempt to higher it 1 meter) and I want to = fix that first. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________ Van: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk name= ns N1BUG paul@n1bug.com [rsgb_lf_group] Verzonden: dinsdag 13 februari 2018 13:59 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk; 600MRG@= mailman.qth.net Onderwerp: [rsgb_lf_group] MF: EU<>NA last night We had decided to try JT9 attempts early in the window but also just before European sunrise, starting at 0530z. Conditions were not good early but during the night WSPR signals came up to very good levels. NO3M and myself were calling CQ. I saw PA0A call CQ a little higher up and moved up to work him. Albert sent me a report but then lost my signal and completed with NO3M. Albert's signal peaked -20 during that time. A little later I had him at -13 on WSPR. A few minutes later I found him calling CQ on JT9 again. We were able to complete a QSO but his signal was never better than -22. I saw a weak signal on my CQ frequency a few times but could not decode it. Could this have been OR7T calling me? Rik had reported that he heard me several times. Even with better conditions and good peak signal levels, QSB was a major problem... still quite deep with short peaks. I do not see how QRSS at any speed could have survived this. Note: I had some problems with my internet service during the night. I've just seen that not all of my WSPR spots were uploaded. Would anyone like to try tomorrow morning? 73, Paul N1BUG FN55mf http://www.n1bug.com/lfmf/ __._,_.___ ________________________________ Posted by: N1BUG ________________________________ Reply via web post * Reply = to sender * Reply to group * Sta= rt a new topic = * Messages in this topic (1) Visit Your Group [Yahoo! Groups] * Privacy * Un= subscribe * Terms of Use . __,_._,___ --_000_151852731206615076kuleuvenbe_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Paul,


I had half a dozen good copies during your QSO with PA0A (congrats on th= at one) and later.

I called you for about 45 minutes, meanwhile it was daylight here.

I had a quick propagation check on WSPR and was decoded by VE9GJ.

Not sure I will be QRV tonight or tomorrow morning, my antenna is behavi= ng strange (probably caused by my attempt to higher it 1 meter) and I want = to fix that first.


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


Van: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogro= ups.co.uk <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk> namens N1BUG paul@n1bug.c= om [rsgb_lf_group] <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk>
Verzonden: dinsdag 13 februari 2018 13:59
Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk; = 600MRG@mailman.qth.net
Onderwerp: [rsgb_lf_group] MF: EU<>NA last night
 
 

We had decided to try JT9 attempts early in the window but also just before European sunrise, starting at 0530z. Conditions were not good
early but during the night WSPR signals came up to very good levels.

NO3M and myself were calling CQ. I saw PA0A call CQ a little higher
up and moved up to work him. Albert sent me a report but then lost
my signal and completed with NO3M. Albert's signal peaked -20 during
that time. A little later I had him at -13 on WSPR. A few minutes
later I found him calling CQ on JT9 again. We were able to complete
a QSO but his signal was never better than -22.

I saw a weak signal on my CQ frequency a few times but could not
decode it. Could this have been OR7T calling me? Rik had reported
that he heard me several times.

Even with better conditions and good peak signal levels, QSB was a
major problem... still quite deep with short peaks. I do not see how
QRSS at any speed could have survived this.

Note: I had some problems with my internet service during the night.
I've just seen that not all of my WSPR spots were uploaded.

Would anyone like to try tomorrow morning?

73,
Paul N1BUG FN55mf
http://www.n1bug.com/lfmf/

__._,_.___
Posted by: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply t= o group • Start a new topic • Mes= sages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___
--_000_151852731206615076kuleuvenbe_--