Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28747 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2001 07:47:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Oct 2001 07:47:25 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 3628 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2001 07:47:09 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 20 Oct 2001 07:47:09 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15uqlp-00035h-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:42:13 +0100 Received: from imo-r08.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.104]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 15uqln-00035c-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:42:12 +0100 Received: from DL4YHF@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id l.151.2bf4d22 (17527) for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 03:41:26 -0400 (EDT) From: DL4YHF@aol.com Message-ID: <151.2bf4d22.290284a6@aol.com> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 03:41:26 EDT Subject: LF: Re: Re: dcf39/dk8kw To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows DE sub 10504 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hello Uwe and group,

About the "mysterious"(?)  carrier observed on DCF/DBF (I think DBF is their spare transmitter):
As Uwe wrote:

>sri, Markus, but the screenshot does`nt convince me.
>sri, Wolfgang, I do not belief in "Kohärenzprobleme".


In a direct mail to Uwe I called it "non-coherent signal",  but it meant exactly the same as Markus (DF6NM) explained here on the reflector a few hours later. I don't think there is any mysterious very-narrow-bandwidth coding.

DCF39 is intended to be received by simple receivers; and the transmitter simply does not care for a coherent carrier just because a few radio amateurs would like to use it as a high-precision reference (hi).


The reason for the incoherent carrier signal maybe this (with my basic knowledge ):
Switching from the "space" frequency to the "mark" frequency in the TX is done when the carrier signal Y(t) crosses zero. After an integer number of full sine wave periods (when Y(t) is zero again), the frequency is switched back again. This will not necessarily be the old phase of the "space" frequency before a data bit. So, as an effect, there is no coherent phase - as explained before.

You could verify this with an audio phase meter. I did this some time ago and could see the phase meter jump around after every pulse train, but could not find a rule. Maybe the amount of phase shift is simply a result of the count of "ones" in the databits.


> I will see my friends at the Radio-Monitoring-Station Itzehoe
> (RegTP-Aussenstelle) to solve the problem (I make it my problem)
> by analysing the frequenzy using their equipment (I have been
> member of the staff).

Please let me know the results.

Good luck,
 Wolf DL4YHF

(now off to look for Dave G(M)3YXM in simple CW without coherence problems. No kite-friendly WX here at the moment,  nothing but blue sky and sun)