Return-Path: Received: from rly-me10.mx.aol.com (rly-me10.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.44]) by air-me09.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINME094-9e34b20db6027b; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:28:46 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me10.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME107-9e34b20db6027b; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:28:34 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NIhBC-0001P2-21 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:27:30 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NIhBB-0001Ot-J0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:27:29 +0000 Received: from web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.127]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NIhBB-0007s2-ED for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:27:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 55462 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2009 11:27:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1260444444; bh=vWhj/agiuB6KZWPgHg62az827l3KQeSrJoLZRHyax80=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cYNRLePCuPLF+9xCVr58NOPJS56cN29aO7qE2NmL4XBeNgDN3HcjQrEydrGIgabbKajFyH9VrFQZT9hABHcnYWaHGypfyl2tCaWBOpQht98nGm85wg0b+iu37db2P9gjil6uGqaGkhZpLKhz7fZ+3Yn86kc/S1bxl3//p8kMNv4= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kr8i3gCPb2v0xLxCzs/pCstvT1CfNJwOkJ37yD/+7gjYaNcCHftSMgQ8xKsDuh/jITFxM6epZD0VRplrEDThonXLrrcIHq1X1haV6opwl0zp3W/KH+sM7ytG2zeYQVkqh8zoc/eh3LvRAFrzNoWAp7ehq1Jyvp6oEgtPnqyOQeE=; Message-ID: <150809.55455.qm@web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: _Ybi2LcVM1m_5WacZ25aRI4fx2zkzpb7Pk9t5Q9XMQonca0ceb.Z2UhzR7BmG.eZB3PCbZf90YEa2dZM5WPvwDAzvMndz_LUMQeHnSaCYVuEWYKzOqk8XyH19siUoWLEK1JiFbUA03lULS6REAH9PO7v4jBCGN.LAcvM0eMwNeFpesfOLp5eSPFLEsLenk1CikqtYnVZaZtYui.NB62i7xdBptCFBpENn1SXXhPFMhAFst3BRBk- Received: from [86.152.87.219] by web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:27:23 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.0.19 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:27:23 -0800 (PST) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: LF: Geneva and WRC-12 Agenda Items Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1417164869-1260444443=:55455" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m274.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail --0-1417164869-1260444443=:55455 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FYI=A0 ??=20 "There is opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime service= via the International Maritime Organisation and this has led to France pr= esenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that suggests a use for the band= 495-505 kHz using datamodes.=A0=A0This was in response to papers from Can= ada and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur band between 493 and 510(= 515) kHz.=A0=A0There appears to be no commercial or technical reasoning be= hind this paper and it is suspected to be based on emotive grounds only.= =A0=A0Nevertheless agenda item 1.23 still requires a lot more support if= it is going to be successful."=20 73 petefmt =20 --0-1417164869-1260444443=:55455 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

FYI&nbs= p; ??=20

"There is= opposition to this proposal, primarily from the maritime service via the= International Maritime Organisation and this has led to France presenting a paper under agenda item 1.10 that suggests= a use for the band 495-505 kHz using datamodes.  This was in re= sponse to papers from Canada and the UK that proposed a secondary amateur= band between 493 and 510(515) kHz.  There appears to be no comm= ercial or technical reasoning behind this paper and it is suspected to be= based on emotive grounds only.  Nevertheless agenda item 1.23= still requires a lot more support if it is going= to be successful."=20

73 pete= fmt


=20 --0-1417164869-1260444443=:55455--