Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2523038000090; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TBUh7-00014c-5s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:56:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TBUh6-00014T-KK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:56:16 +0100 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13] helo=smtpa2.mediabeam.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TBUh4-0003Cw-Mj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:56:15 +0100 Received: from IMAP4 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa2.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q8BHuCFr010853 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:56:12 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:56:04 +0200 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <14ee05b4a92d4fe191ab2561550f002a@kabelmail.de> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Wolfgang, thanks. I printed the diagram and the print made its way to the workbench. the next step will be in some weeks. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 10.09.2012 22:05 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Kopie: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Betreff: LF: Small "linear" medium wave PA [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d63ea50e288c5ecb9bd7a86eeabe94f2 Subject: Re: LF: Small "linear" medium wave PA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----ABA7A45BDD6A473F8399E4DD7A22C974" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d7504f7b75590c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------ABA7A45BDD6A473F8399E4DD7A22C974 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Wolfgang, thanks=2E I printed the diagram and the print made its way to the workbench=2E the next step will be in some weeks=2E=20 =A0GL=20 Uwe/dj8wx=20 Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 10=2E09=2E2012 22:05 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Kopie: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups=2Eco=2Euk Betreff: LF: Small "linear" medium wave PA Hello Uwe, I have completed the 2nd part of the circuit diagram of my small=20 "linear" PA : http://www=2Eqsl=2Enet/dl4yhf/mf_reception/MF_Reception=2Ehtml#mf_line= ar_pa You may have to reload the page (press F5) since it has just been uplo= aded=2E IMO, the efficiency for this power range (50 =2E=2E=2E 60 watts in my = case) is=20 adequate=2E It's simple, and even when "slightly overdriven" it retain= s=20 the amplitude ramp of the keying signal from the driving transmitter (= IC=20 706 with 2 watts output on MF)=2E When driven to the clipping point, w= hich=20 is OK for CW, the amplifier drew just above 3 amps DC at 13=2E8 Volts = to=20 produce 30 watts of RF=2E At that power level, a small heatsink ("CPU=20 cooler") is sufficient=2E With more turns on the drain output transformer, and a larger heatsink= ,=20 even more power would be possible, possibly up to 100 watts (which I=20 don't need at DF0WD)=2E The DC overcurrent protection is simple but effective: With the two=20 transistors on the 2nd part of the circuit, the gate bias voltage is=20 simply "pulled down" so the drain current and power dissipation stays = in=20 non-lethal limits (for the MOSFETs)=2E The 30 milliohms resistor is ju= st a=20 short piece of 'Constantan' wire=2E It is barely visible on the photo = of=20 the board, near the "DC current sense / limiter"=2E All the best, Wolf =2E ------ABA7A45BDD6A473F8399E4DD7A22C974 Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Wolfgang,
thanks=2E
I printed the diagram and the print made its way to the workbench=2E the next step will be in some weeks=2E

 GL

Uwe/dj8wx



Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 10=2E09=2E2012 22:05
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Kopie: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups=2Eco=2Euk
Betreff: LF: Small "linear" medium wave PA


Hello Uwe,

I have completed the 2nd part of the circuit diagram of my small
"linear" PA :

http://www=2Eqsl=2Enet/dl4yhf/mf_reception/MF_Reception=2Ehtml#mf_linea= r_pa

You may have to reload the page (press F5) since it has just been uploa= ded=2E

IMO, the efficiency for this power range (50 =2E=2E=2E 60 watts in my c= ase) is
adequate=2E It's simple, and even when "slightly overdriven" it retains=
the amplitude ramp of the keying signal from the driving transmitter (I= C
706 with 2 watts output on MF)=2E When driven to the clipping point, wh= ich
is OK for CW, the amplifier drew just above 3 amps DC at 13=2E8 Volts t= o
produce 30 watts of RF=2E At that power level, a small heatsink ("CPU <= br /> cooler") is sufficient=2E

With more turns on the drain output transformer, and a larger heatsink,=
even more power would be possible, possibly up to 100 watts (which I don't need at DF0WD)=2E

The DC overcurrent protection is simple but effective: With the two transistors on the 2nd part of the circuit, the gate bias voltage is simply "pulled down" so the drain current and power dissipation stays i= n
non-lethal limits (for the MOSFETs)=2E The 30 milliohms resistor is jus= t a
short piece of 'Constantan' wire=2E It is barely visible on the photo o= f
the board, near the "DC current sense / limiter"=2E

All the best,
Wolf =2E
------ABA7A45BDD6A473F8399E4DD7A22C974--