Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6354 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2001 16:59:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 30 Jan 2001 16:59:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 23689 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2001 17:03:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 30 Jan 2001 17:03:02 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Ne2L-0006fd-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:53:45 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from kuku-rwcmta.excite.com ([198.3.99.63] helo=kuku.excite.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Ne27-0006f9-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:53:32 +0000 Received: from bronty ([199.172.153.112]) by kuku.excite.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.39 201-229-119-122) with ESMTP id <20010130165247.HXCI12117.kuku.excite.com@bronty>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:52:47 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <14804074.980873567239.JavaMail.imail@bronty> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:52:45 -0800 (PST) From: "john sexton" To: "Alan Melia" Subject: LF: Re: Reception of Larry Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Excite Inbox X-Sender-Ip: 62.253.64.5 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Alan, Thought I should acknowledge your several e-mails regarding Translatlantic reception and say thanks. I haven't monitored for Larry since I managed to get a complete sequence a week ago now, but it begins to look as though I was just lucky, judging from the reports from others. So I shall have another go tonight. The pre-dawn period does appear to be best for Larry, but I suspect that this may not be true for Jack, based on previous monitoring, i.e. the best time may well depend on where the station is in the U.S. or Canada. The CFH peaks were earlier in the night were they not? It was also interesting to see how several others have had this experience of the QRN almost suddenly disappearing around 6 ish (it occurred at 6.20 when I first saw it), but I am not convinced that we know the reason yet. I also agree that Solar maximum is probably not a good time for these experiments and anticipate that by the time of the minimum, transatlantic QSOs on LF may well be commonplace. You mention that one of the other dual lines about 0.5Hz higher in frequency fades out about 30 minutes earlier than Larry. I too had seen this. It is the higher frequency one at almost exactly 137790 to within 0.1Hz. It would be interesting to know what and where the transmitter is. The modulation is too high a frequency for us to see it with Argo, but may contribute to the fading and blurring that I see. By the way the strong line at 137763.8 appears to be a DCF42/DCF49 intermodulation spur as described recently by Markus. This frequency fits exactly the formula he gave. 73, John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/