Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1481; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u7QJ1pLl028144 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:01:52 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1bdMFm-0005v3-UG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:53:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1bdMFg-0005uu-K2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:53:16 +0100 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([2a02:2c40:0:c0::25:130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bdMFe-00088G-Cx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:53:15 +0100 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: 8228C128140.A5887 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-2e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.34]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8228C128140 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX22.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-exmbx22.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.11.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-2.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E26A200B7 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.62) by ICTS-S-EXMBX22.luna.kuleuven.be (10.112.11.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:53:06 +0200 Received: from ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a]) by ICTS-S-EXMBX27.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::291a:cc4f:6953:698a%33]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:53:06 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: Re: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? Thread-Index: AQHR/5AFn3FJLOg3DkmTjk8NCZZtrqBbKaYi///uS4CAAH3Oaw== Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:53:06 +0000 Message-ID: <1472237582611.52507@kuleuven.be> References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB5D7D1BA1@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<57C02C0F.1070706@posteo.de> <1472214987642.19825@kuleuven.be>,<57C04195.7040808@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <57C04195.7040808@posteo.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.112.50.1] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: Re: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u7QJ1pLl028144 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 8635 Hi Stefan, the picture makes clear what you intend to do. A possible pitfall could be the behaviour of the 1.3H coil at 475kHz (self resonances). 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens DK7FC Verzonden: vrijdag 26 augustus 2016 15:18 Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: Re: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? Hi Rik, OK, a picture tells more than 1000 words: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_MF_Diplexer.jpg While drawing the picture i saw that i had to correct my idea. The transformer should be in series and i have to think about the lower series C. Another thing is that the MF transmitter should act as a shortcut for ULF so the transformer does not act as a (saturated) L. So the picture is updated. 73, Stefan Am 26.08.2016 14:36, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hi Stefan, > > if you can keep both transmitters from feeding power into each other it should work. > But one thing to keep in mind is that the 2nF parallel capacitor needed on ULF will reduce the overall (antenna + parallel C) resistance at 475kHz significantly. > It is not clear to me what configuration you intend to use, but maybe you should try to avoid that the 2nF cap is drawing a lot of 475kHz current. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org namens DK7FC > Verzonden: vrijdag 26 augustus 2016 13:46 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? > > Hi all, > > I would like to run some transmissions on MF WSPR but i also like to run > a longer transmission on 2.97 kHz. In the current ULF TX installation > i'm using a parallel 2 nF capacitor anyway. This is just -j167 Ohm on > MF. I could series compensate it with 65 uH (which is just j1.2 Ohm at > 2970 Hz :-) ) to ground. The 65 uH could be parallel compensated for MF, > using 280 nF. Then i could add a ferrite transformer to apply the MF RF > across the 65uH/280nF parallel circuit. The large loading coil of 1.3 H > will be a high impedance, hopefully, as long as there is no internal > resonance on MF due to its own winding capacity. > The 2 nF capacitor will have to handle the sum current of ULF and MF. > QRO is not possible on MF i think but it will handle a few watts which > is fine for WSPR. Hmm, worth a try? > > 73, Stefan > > >