Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sA3NZqAG010794 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 00:35:52 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1XlR5d-0007OA-2W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:31:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1XlR5c-0007O1-IA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:31:12 +0000 Received: from nm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([216.109.114.70]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XlR5Z-0005iT-UW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:31:11 +0000 Received: from [66.196.81.165] by nm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2014 23:31:07 -0000 Received: from [66.196.81.139] by tm11.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2014 23:31:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.access.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2014 23:31:07 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=sbcglobal.net Result=Signature OK X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 137926.84254.bm@omp1015.access.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 5822 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Nov 2014 23:31:06 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1415057466; bh=77gFh+8efpGdxjfef2cseh0frBB9P3CLyGIJ54hebxw=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZIcMSuKmmniPIfxv6XWuUfctsj5U2Fkle9Ak/mqz9lLrkeO/4ninKyhLwVqojCo19lOnKYwqpJj/xs3DqlpjItfV2Y7u0rCEWzDQXBtio81Xnk6JbW6hEATooBv5O+aPC6Zpzu8Fyw4vXlvpdY9CjIxeLnb6Hexnid77HHlgRIU= X-YMail-OSG: ke7WIJEVM1nlHbpS2uQ8IO1NDLAbahrmRxF5uHbBJLk9izr 99Lg8EJTMsb54wONBttbaELbbpsdEq5TjBhzQCS0ZZkH1BnIvnTiI8_HbkYa JJ8v5gKspwCBwsfGb_wiscAxW4tNFnLWlOb7OY6lenmZbbYm9.a.BJmMiZ25 stZVYVj6T6A2bTlXYYtXtMjsjyhL_PPxzQEyj9AIPjN89qJznvgytrx9dNM8 L6r8aF34pTjmQLyjkDbHYPvL.DbaRz_90vlkyvJsdtV_L0EEK.sUztSDBgj_ Ju3fziiExMeVtsatiKX__crCEfYS.f3TkxRTEx5xpYeBI.XFeqjv5SFdBhAq Uw2k0NgxrFZJmsFKdRwXM13GXVM8NDvl8oVG8.0HHP56_0ByYgiSvkGailKo YauiIQNCTiw11s_rsmi2R7od6d24CfdI2L6dN_93TDQdnfBmi1c06665rBmP ijavuuCL9GJhf0gfWSNQ6ifZiqdNmOW5qg2U8Qj7MOgBB5T0mDY7xkVJ0ghs 55dvrxBPwIjkRzspHAtSfAqFAyPiG8Lk2aGB37MEYfOaqp8._uwOYeGwNxEH rYnRZgLXEadzgESI8bXnKgcXGZcIoA2we_t7sVsijU8ld.7B2MpN_8krpVGm 7189dwA-- Received: from [108.71.124.117] by web181006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:31:06 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,S3Vkb3MgU3RlZmFuISAgSSBhZ3JlZSAxMDAlLi4gVGhpcyBzYW1lIHNpdHVhdGlvbiBoYXMgYmVlbiB0aGUgY2FzZSBvbiAxMG0gZm9yIGEgbG9uZyB0aW1lLi4uIG9wZW4gYmFuZCBidXQgbm8gb25lIHVzaW5nIGl0LiAgU29tZW9uZSBoYXMgdG8gVFggZmlyc3QhCgpXZSBzaG93ZWQgdGhhdCBhdXJhbCBDVyBpcyBxdWl0ZSB2aWFibGUgYWxsIG92ZXIgTkEgdGhpcyBwYXN0IHdlZWtlbmQgZHVyaW5nIG91ciBzcGVjaWFsIGV2ZW50LiAgTG90cyBvZiByZXBvcnRzIGZyb20gcGVvcGxlIHRoYXQgaGFkIG5vIGkBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.733 References: <5457825A.7080308@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1415057466.23751.YahooMailNeo@web181006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:31:06 -0800 From: John Langridge To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <5457825A.7080308@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 2015a9c9c70c0326c96b00c8a41f50f5 Subject: Re: LF: MF CW activity Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1368850351-127358280-1415057466=:23751" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1033 --1368850351-127358280-1415057466=:23751 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Kudos Stefan! I agree 100%.. This same situation has been the case on 10m for a long time... open band but no one using it. Someone has to TX first! We showed that aural CW is quite viable all over NA this past weekend during our special event. Lots of reports from people that had no idea it was possible on 630m CW or that 630m existed like in your situation. Now they know HI! 73! John WG2XIQ / KB5NJD ________________________________ From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 7:25 AM Subject: LF: MF CW activity Hi MF, Just regarding CW activity on MF, below you can find another good example that (CW) activity rises activity. So if there is no one on the band, just call CQ, preverably with Q R O so that many stations can hear you, even those with local QRM and compromise antennas. First they must hear you, then they may start to improve their RX system and just then they will hear the QRP stations! Even if no one answers, the calls are not "a waste of energy and time". At least for me it's nice to know there are a few people outside catchinhg the signal, maybe even unintended :-) In that case, the OM didn't even know that the 630m band is existing for radio amateurs! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Forwarded email with kind permission by the author: >>-------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>Betreff: 600m band >>Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:37:54 +0000 >>Von: fagend123 . >>An: dk7fc@darc.de >> >> >>From Leighton GW-20048 / GW0LBI >> >> Hello Stefan, >> Just a short email to tell you that I picked up your signals on the 600m band yesterday evening. I heard you calling CQ a few times with your locator JN49, then you started working another DK station called Rudi. I didn't get the callsign of the other station because of local QRM, but your signals were clear here at times, best report 519 for you. >> >> I was tuning on my RX looking for the non-directional aircraft beacons between 280KHz and 530KHz when I came across your CQ calling on 473KHz. At first I thought there must be a fault with my RX because I didn't know about the new 600m band, but now that I do, I'll listen there some more! Very interesting! >> >> My SWL station is a Trio R-600 with end-fed wire antenna (see GW0LBI on QRZ.com), and my location is Bargoed Wales, IO81jq if that is any use to you. >> >> Anyway hope this helps Stefan, I'll listen for you again, and good luck. >> >> >>Guten Tag, >> >> >> Leighton GW-20049 / GW0LBI >> --1368850351-127358280-1415057466=:23751 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Kudos Stefan!  I agree 100%.. This same situation has been the case on 10m for a long time... open band but no one using it.  Someone has to TX first!

We showed that aural CW is quite viable all over NA this past weekend during our special event.  Lots of reports from people that had no idea it was possible on 630m CW or that 630m existed like in your situation. Now they know HI!

73!

John WG2XIQ / KB5NJD


From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 7:25 AM
Subject: LF: MF CW activity

Hi MF,

Just regarding CW activity on MF, below you can find another good example that (CW) activity rises activity. So if there is no one on the band, just call CQ, preverably with Q R O so that many stations can hear you, even those with local QRM and compromise antennas. First they must hear you, then they may start to improve their RX system and just then they will hear the QRP stations! Even if no one answers, the calls are not "a waste of energy and time". At least for me it's nice to know there are a few people outside catchinhg the signal, maybe even unintended :-) In that case, the OM didn't even know that the 630m band is existing for radio amateurs!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Forwarded email with kind permission by the author:

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: 600m band
Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:37:54 +0000
Von: fagend123 . <gw0lbi@googlemail.com>
An: dk7fc@darc.de


From Leighton GW-20048 / GW0LBI

Hello Stefan,
Just a short email to tell you that I picked up your signals on the 600m band yesterday evening. I heard you calling CQ a few times with your locator JN49, then you started working another DK station called Rudi. I didn't get the callsign of the other station because of local QRM, but your signals were clear here at times, best report 519 for you.

I was tuning on my RX looking for the non-directional aircraft beacons between 280KHz and 530KHz when I came across your CQ calling on 473KHz. At first I thought there must be a fault with my RX because I didn't know about the new 600m band, but now that I do, I'll listen there some more! Very interesting!

My SWL station is a Trio R-600 with end-fed wire antenna (see GW0LBI on QRZ.com), and my location is Bargoed Wales, IO81jq if that is any use to you.

Anyway hope this helps Stefan, I'll listen for you again, and good luck.

Guten Tag,

Leighton GW-20049 / GW0LBI




--1368850351-127358280-1415057466=:23751--