Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:09 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore05.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DaYoO-0007mw-Hk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:09 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore05.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DaYoO-0007mG-8P for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:08 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DaYnl-0005oC-7I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:46:29 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DaYnk-0005o3-Rh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:46:28 +0100 Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DaYnj-0006kz-AT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:46:28 +0100 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id l.140.449929e1 (48552) for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 08:46:16 -0400 (EDT) From: G4gvw@aol.com Message-ID: <140.449929e1.2fc47c18@aol.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:46:16 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5003 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of aol.com designates 64.12.137.9 as permitted sender Subject: Re: LF: reception with multiple antennas Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi All,

This is interesting stuff! Alan, G3NYK and I have had many discussions over the past few years along the lines of a transmitting equivalent of this idea. The basic premise is that it should be possible to effectively "synthesize" a large array from generators at a number of widely spaced locations. We have done little more than just discuss the ideas but maybe it could be an interesting area of experimentation and development. I would be interested in seeing a wider discussion of the subject - perhaps some of our more expert and knowledgeable "gurus" might care to comment?

73 de pat g4gvw