Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AE4AA38000086; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:30:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ToVJn-0001aJ-Se for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:29:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ToVJn-0001aA-DN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:29:27 +0000 Received: from smtp1web.tin.it ([212.216.176.195]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ToVJk-0000S5-0c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:29:26 +0000 Received: from feu5 (10.192.64.15) by smtp1web.tin.it (8.6.023.02) id 50BF4D97005C61E1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:02 +0100 Received: from (95.244.206.44) by webmailcommunicator.alice.it; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:02 +0100 Message-ID: <13be0a0f32e.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:29:02 +0100 (CET) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 95.244.206.44 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, the only explication is failure of cap(s)....which I have to replace with other hugher units... Marco [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: R: Re: R: Re: LF: SV8CS - DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404950dd58a655ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Hi Stefan, the only explication is failure of cap(s)....which I have to replace with other hugher units... Marco ----Messaggio originale---- Da: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de Data: 27-dic-2012 20.31 A: Ogg: Re: R: Re: LF: SV8CS - DK7FC Am 27.12.2012 20:13, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > [...] A quick check and I had DC on the output transformer > primary winding... > How can you have a DC component on the primary winding? Is the resistance of that winding so high (don't think so) or was that DC current extremely high while measuring a few mV DC? Where can we find the schematic of the PA? :-) 73, Stefan > Murphy law.. condition improving...tx out of use! > GL > > 73 Marco, IK1HSS >