Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=iEpTZ0vPkDI+0YBjNREhLdNRRrN06zLFYyUVvT/exd26BJ/GBxcF9btqdX1D91PNE6WcTsH8nUvcu8bk/qw1r9Meo98l90BiWVHgnj5J+Lnv8/0Ui8+CKwHhVWtsrD9gofPe9eswrQEOZ1ABzK3+BhC5VZBsdE0U6AYqOWCqSyw=;
Message-ID: <1395140519.4427.YahooMailBasic@web173005.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:01:59 +0000 (GMT)
From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: BIA kaputt?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

> Hi all
>=20
> Does anyone know BIAs working
> conditions? Like antenna type and size and TX O/P?=A0 Also
> here I note it has a stronger lower side band?
>=20
>=20
> 73 es GL Pete
> M0FMT IO91UX
>=20
> --------------------------------------------
> On Mon, 17/3/14, wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
> wrote:
>=20
>=A0 Subject: Re: LF: BIA
> kaputt?
>=A0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=A0 Date: Monday, 17 March, 2014, 21:42
>=A0=20
>=A0 Hi Stefan and all,
>=A0=20
>=A0 Guess that's not BIA but
> a
>=A0 goddamn RTTY transmitter, forgotten
> somewhere=20
>=A0 in the eastern woods, with the
> operator being
>=A0 so poor he cannot even=20
>=A0 affort crystals for
>=A0 frequency
> control. At greater resolution, the wobbly=20
>=20
> drifting individual carriers can be seen.
>=20
> Someone there rattling his rusty sword, I
>=20
> presume.
>=A0=20
>=A0 73,
>=A0 =A0=A0=A0Wolf=A0 DL4YHF .
>=A0=20
>=A0=20
>=A0=20
>=A0 Am
>=A0 17.03.2014 22:32, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:
>=A0 > Hi MF,
>=A0 >
>=A0 > What is BIA doing tonite? I saw this
>=A0 strange pattern on a few grabbers.
>=A0 >
>=A0 Apart from that, the
> nice CW signals peaking 50 dB SNR here
>=A0 seem
> to be=20
>=A0 > quite unimpressed by these
>=A0 "sidebands"...
>=20
> >
>=A0 > 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>=20
>=20
>=A0=20
>