Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp4353igc; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.106.134 with SMTP id gu6mr4575819wib.61.1394779115792; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rz17si3140392wjb.88.2014.03.13.23.38.35 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@yahoo.co.uk; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.co.uk Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WOL2H-0002an-BA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:52:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WOL2G-0002ae-7T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:52:00 +0000 Received: from nm36-vm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.97.138]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WOL2E-0002j7-3S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:51:59 +0000 Received: from [212.82.98.49] by nm36.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2014 05:51:56 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.92] by tm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2014 05:51:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1029.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2014 05:51:56 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 29729.71324.bm@omp1029.mail.ir2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 42427 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2014 05:51:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1394776315; bh=mzgch1d2KN7c06o16D24G2z4sq9PWF5z+vrixwMjvSk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jHt++mf35fXM1UOETY/4RO136PrQBH5HuDOCTj6IIJVbBNjTWBH68p+cMIe6BD4+5byTCqZf3P8k+Xma4DMlptbcQMK+6UH83v18MUAaRisrCROvThHSRssOEimngTlRrpm/eOcrdDJg1Jqh0rZi5PYd+QXQ74Z7qO+hKPut5Mo= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QXmk/fenYjpFuRcouJkccVt0BnKKJQqOc1+baZmMlHQNPeDbL3YZPZ58IlzR9wcX10gYxDqdNKCgjXxXuPMSF4SA4tDssu+F/ma8nSKE9tjkbfvJPZLQzibnNbg1C+kP5czO1AOb1wOoN6fV0BMKJTTiQ3aw0XLQ38LFKOMGb1A=; X-YMail-OSG: I9Y5AgsVM1m6gRVTvTCpDxzPFUFZBhDLCW2GoaIqyhQlDJk vrqLv4K2E9sRmHHivwkX6DpDEdRc_bF0sPXbgMorQL8P4svT8Hmn55Qj1JKt Y0hkh5JlOh1NqlWFFAGZMxqr_O9B4qqXe3Wi86UgBSfBcrlxMS09.lCAVj.y fuDBFYWLxtbQhccm7xvONa61NghZ0tLa.XB48m_AAauEamD.J9q_8RocO.8f 8S1OVIvfUSg7gjG9XU1moGlEvR.bR8s4V3FB1.qseHV39J5iP3pNqszXCHLm wjwhefDtm_A5G2AOTr2CRwbS1uT0t.fRcRTKZvlKjClR9c4iyW7xc6kiJ3ZQ DuGcFAsF6Xmo.H4yA.nsucPVKDvhSdODQOJbo2MDE4zl0U4QzM95hfDdrCfJ Jq6PKF3BH5g5LHPp4nBcVNTRKXLn9Nf6fO4U8RE6cUnISva55sREnYGGNwzn jYftyTmtmhru7qjKm7zePT5TgzOuRCn.KWZp8s_nYKN2dZCdpqdHmtegnPi4 wY89Sw4FTByDIWinEqhv75vWq2tEkrlHrBM5..xSEdrMl_ahIO0Hx655i Received: from [86.27.119.173] by web133002.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:51:55 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,TEYsCgpZZXMsIHRoZSBMRiBiYW5kIGFwcGVhcnMgZGVhZCBhcyBmYXIgYXMgcmVhbCBRU08ncyBhcmUgY29uY2VybmVkLgoKCkZvbGxvd2luZyBEYXZlIEczWVhNJ3MgUmFkQ29tIGFydGljbGUgb24gTEYgLyBNRiBJIGJlYWNvbmVkIGFuZCBjYWxsZWQgQ1Egb24gMTM3Ljcga0h6IGV4dGVuc2l2ZWx5IGZvciBjb25zZWN1dGl2ZSB3ZWVrZW5kcy4KTXkgc2lnbmFscyBhcmUgbm90IGh1Z2UgYnV0IGhhdmUgYSByYW5nZSBvZiBzZXZlcmFsIGh1bmRyZWQga20ganVkZ2luZyBmcm9tIHRoZSB2YXJpb3VzIGdyYWIBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.178.641 References: <532254CF.1090400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: <1394776315.62062.YahooMailNeo@web133002.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:51:55 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Osborn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <532254CF.1090400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF, Yes, the LF band appears dead as far as real QSO's are concerned. Following Dave G3YXM's RadCom article on LF / MF I beaconed and called CQ on 137.7 kHz extensively for consecutive weekends. My signals are not huge but have a range of several hundred km judging from the various grabbers' displays. Apart from one CW QSO with Dave on 136.5 kHz I had no other report or reply! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.97.138 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (g3xiz[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1908b49407fc556987226b536cc4bad0 Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1350297820-2028312822-1394776315=:62062" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ---1350297820-2028312822-1394776315=:62062 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LF,=0A=0AYes, the LF band appears dead as far as real QSO's are concerned.= =0A=0A=0AFollowing Dave G3YXM's RadCom article on LF / MF I beaconed and ca= lled CQ on 137.7 kHz extensively for consecutive weekends.=0AMy signals are= not huge but have a range of several hundred km judging from the various g= rabbers' displays.=0AApart from one CW QSO with Dave on 136.5 kHz I had no = other report or reply!=0A=0ALF operators are spread far too thinly and unle= ss one makes a sked or advertises well in advance then the chances of a QSO= are very slim.=0A=0AIn the good old days the time for calling / QSO's used= to be 'on the hour'.=0AIt's now probably time to have specific=A0 'day and= hour' periods each month for LF activity.=0AIf we knew that say the second= Sunday in each month at 10.00Z would be activity time then maybe a few mor= e ops would dust the cobwebs from their rusty LF rigs.=0A=0A73=0AChris G3XI= Z=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Friday, 14 March 2014, 1:03, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:=0A =0ALF!=0A=0AThere's not much activity thes= e days on 137 kHz. I thought i spend the =0Anight in good old QRSS-60 on 13= 6.172 kHz.=0A=0AReports welcome :-)=0A=0A73, Stefan/DK7FC ---1350297820-2028312822-1394776315=:62062 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
LF,

= Yes, the LF band appears dead as far as real QSO's are concerned.
=

Following Dave G3YXM= 's RadCom article on LF / MF I beaconed and called CQ on 137.7 kHz extensiv= ely for consecutive weekends.
My signals are not huge but have a range of several hundred= km judging from the various grabbers' displays.
Apart from one CW QSO with Dave on 136.5= kHz I had no other report or reply!

LF operators are spread far too thinly and unless one= makes a sked or advertises well in advance then the chances of a QSO are v= ery slim.

=
In the good o= ld days the time for calling / QSO's used to be 'on the hour'.
It's n= ow probably time to have specific  'day and hour' periods each month f= or LF activity.
If we knew that say the second Sunday in each month at 10.00Z would be ac= tivity time then maybe a few more ops would dust the cobwebs from their rus= ty LF rigs.

73
Chris G3XIZ=


On Friday= , 14 March 2014, 1:03, Stefan Sch=E4fer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de&= gt; wrote:
LF!

Th= ere's not much activity these days on 137 kHz. I thought i spend the
ni= ght in good old QRSS-60 on 136.172 kHz.

Reports welcome :-)

73, Stefan/D= K7FC



---1350297820-2028312822-1394776315=:62062--