Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 42D7C380000B2; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:38:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sccte-0001sS-38 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:37:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Scctd-0001sJ-HS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:37:05 +0100 Received: from smtp3web.tin.it ([212.216.176.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Scctb-0001wm-Cg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:37:04 +0100 Received: from fep-mail-web-l2b.virgilio.net (212.48.20.162) by smtp3web.tin.it (8.6.023.02) id 4ECA5B5302E5E569 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:37:01 +0200 Message-ID: <137c7299a54.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:37:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 81.201.7.62 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ben, Stefan and LF, also here in Italy no news... but of course our administration has more important tasks.. It could be a nice idea rise money from hams and save the balance! 73 Marco eiceses ---- Messaggio originale---- Da: 7-giu-2012 2.27 PM A: Ogg: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 027eb28428a0ed4e20e06b28d08cfc7b Subject: R: Re: LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:413562400:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4fd0aecd1997 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Ben, Stefan and LF, also here in Italy no news... but of course=20 our administration has more important tasks.. It could be a nice idea=20 rise money from hams and save the balance! 73 Marco eiceses ---- Messaggio originale---- Da: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de Data:=20 7-giu-2012 2.27 PM A: Ogg: Re: LF:=20 VX9MRC 504.1 kHz Hi Ben, I do not intend to run so much power. I will=20 rather build a small PA and=20 a lossy coil. A lossy coil has a lower Q=20 and a braoder bandwidth and so=20 i will not need to adjust the resonance=20 when making QSY within the band,=20 hopefully. That makes things easier. On MF i plan to focus on plain handgiven CW. No QRSS, no grabber,=20 maybe=20 even no computer. However Speclab would be fine to get an=20 overview of=20 the band activity and offers nice filter and noise=20 reduction tools... I'm really excited how the band will be populated.=20 It's not so far away=20 from 1800 kHz and an ordinary amateur radio=20 antenna, e.g. a dipole for=20 80m, configured as a T antenna will work=20 reasonable if a suitable earth=20 is available. But what's the problem=20 in France? You have so much space for large=20 antennas, don't you? Or do=20 you live in Paris City? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.06.2012 14:17,=20 schrieb manginbenoit.pro: > Lucky you Stefan, lucky you ! Probably the=20 reason for your KW ERP. > > My "reasonable" setup indicates me that /=20 triple/ that value could be=20 > necessary... > > CU there > > Ben > > > > Message du 07/06/12 14:12 > > De : "Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer" > >=20 A : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Copie =C3=A0 : > > Objet : Re:=20 LF: VX9MRC 504.1 kHz > > > > I only heared some rumours about=20 the permission starting > January, 1st, > > 2013, here in DL.=20 Also i heard rumours that a permit is given > out on the > >=20 Ham Radio 2012 > (http://www.hamradio-friedrichshafen.de/ham- en/index.php) > > , which would be in 3 weeks! But i guess 2013 is=20 more realistic. > > > > Time to build a suitable loading coil=20 for MF. I will need about > 240 uH > > only... > > > >=20 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > Am 07.06.2012 13:49, schrieb=20 manginbenoit.pro: > > > Are there other EU countries (apart from=20 the British Isles) > > > granting MF access to the amateur service=20 so fast ? > > > > > > We in France still did not hear even the=20 smallest whisper from > our > > > tutelage administration. Or=20 maybe am I not well informed. > > > > > > 73 > > > > >=20 > Ben > > > >=20 >