Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F08FA3800008A; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbXk4-0003jf-Ex for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:54:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbXk3-0003jW-Id for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:54:43 +0100 Received: from smtp3web.tin.it ([212.216.176.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbXk1-0006tv-HG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:54:42 +0100 Received: from fep-mail-web-l2b.virgilio.net (212.48.20.162) by smtp3web.tin.it (8.6.023.02) id 4ECA5B5302D75750 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:54:39 +0200 Message-ID: <137b7c6a9d9.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:54:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "marcocadeddu@tin.it" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 81.201.7.62 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear LF, I'm really thinking about stop subscription to groups and enjoy ham radio on the air.. We have still a bit of freedom and we can meet the same people in more than a group! If I have time to check on 2 reflectors is fine but sure I hate to loose time to delete a huge amount of messages.. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.237 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: R: Re: LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:484059040:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e4fccbe5b3670 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear LF, I'm really thinking about stop subscription to groups and=20 enjoy ham radio on the air.. We have still a bit of freedom and we can=20 meet the same people in more than a group! If I have time to check on 2=20 reflectors is fine but sure I hate to loose time to delete a huge=20 amount of messages.. 73 CU on air Marco IK1HSS ----Messaggio=20 originale---- Da: rogerlapthorn@gmail.com Data: 4-giu-2012 2.33 PM A:=20 "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Ogg: Re:=20 LF: Re: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE Dear Mal, Who said anything about ME being a moderator of the LF=20 group? Not me.=20 Please, stop this personal and nasty hate campaign.=20 73s Roger G3XBM -- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver -- On 4 Jun 2012, at=20 13:17, "mal hamilton" wrote: > Reference=20 postings from G3XBM > I am concerned about items 9 and 10 > Messages=20 can be VETTED and DIFFICULT members banned. > Sounds like a POLICE=20 state and what are the credentials of those VETTING and what is a=20 DIFFICULT member probably someone who has a different opinion or point=20 of view from his or even a sense of HUMOUR > What ever happens avoid=20 him as a moderator > =20 > de g3kev > =20 > =20 > ----- Original Message=20 ----- > From: Roger Lapthorn > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; Alan=20 Melia ; Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer ; Markus Vester ; James Moritz=20 > Sent:=20 Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 PM > Subject: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo=20 group instead .....PLEASE >=20 > With the latest outage (5 days already)=20 may I again suggest that the LF-reflector migrates to a Yahoo group? >=20 > In over 10 years I have rarely had delays in messages, outages, or=20 problems with any group to which I belong or moderate. >=20 > Instead=20 they have had these advantages: > Messages can be read on the web if=20 preferred (saves cluttered in-boxes) > There is rarely a delay of more=20 than a few minutes before messages are received. > All messages are=20 archived and searchable. > Large files can be stored. > Photos can be=20 stored - 100Gigs worth. > Links can be stored/shared > Videos can be=20 stored. > Polls can be run. > Messages can be vetted if preferred (by a=20 number of moderators to speed up the process) > Difficult members can=20 be banned in exceptional circumstances. > Spam messages can be filtered > Calendars can be set up (for sked times, news of tests etc) > The=20 advantages go ON and ON and, frankly, I simply cannot understand why=20 the change hasn't made years ago. With the problems this week it is=20 surely time. >=20 > To set up a new Yahoo group called "LF-reflector" (or=20 whatever) would take about 30 seconds and migration to it by all=20 interested members here would take about a day at most. All you need is=20 to agree a group name, who owns it, who can moderate posts and some=20 basic group ground rules/FAQs. >=20 > Please, think about it again.=20 >=20 >=20 73s > Roger G3XBM >=20 > --=20 > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http: //www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > http: //qss2.blogspot.com/ >=20