Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AD97C380000A9; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 04:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U3kW4-000888-DU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U3kW2-00087z-KX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:06 +0000 Received: from nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.95]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U3kVz-0003Iy-Ts for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:05 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.50] by nm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 09:44:39 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.117] by tm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 09:44:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 09:44:39 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 376554.61971.bm@omp1026.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 66330 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2013 09:44:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1360316678; bh=86oJdTIEXqqWAAia+HoPpxU8XgiUNj8SE/BOLHuaIQk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Zh9rosmby2VKOeB4zfCpzq8ckWuktBop6+HNKaspooflwgr09DrfiRMUnqaAPmDxr+EUAmCCHI822IBZNzsQkCeInpb3DAKiyGnd9US3fjIxjFpng2BFv6Nt15IUBeljOUcBRyOav+4x0Kj4vDPnckHZU76PN+yaUGksMv75ii8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IsvpMJKkUJ012geVqB2ojG27TsizK15aR6OgmB/KIFDTge8QWhpHtG9L1iJY7iZZPAG5OPSIH2TbrdZU9nsWSFgzegOcrVoADYvoQ6RBmq4gqxVkrZzi52yvMG1r7dBazwDM/5YOIJnBlpBxxOR6HAHiVJjJAyFKPQSrVxibmdg=; X-YMail-OSG: jGfYsN4VM1mvSjd2e1Xghbo4bmlH7YzDLLKEtSymmLorSFA IloJGaLg_qujh3CY06R0SzRFkJ.QMB3ZWg_WKW_T.Qh0BYpcm0w8j9b2kAA2 ftmz6nZWs3OLjs3C8DGjd_FVHS36gWxXjbIkJbGUq.e47XGzE5gXZ3_w_cNR AtisO00HnIpJjOVS_YTpPXMkGueZ.D9JJlEMXAQoPqIxERo4c2tm0mXAmSQA wfaOC2zVTQosNUBH6TIYRyx.UCjLlrcbLGhbH.0kY4JVkTgzUaYGKSlhfUe1 eKMQ2rHvCU4piuNUTaa7PZ5gBOTxCt4oCtVOtZMJGkqRpV3Pyvq2XeD4lSf7 jK8ZrNXp.2EWn6VQ22GOgX6aAmrhMAdCYrbGD9Biy8YoKNVt3N9MYTufSERo QTVjq5VnZkRW0HVAlSOgjOqY2.xPDU7_MH8x8qNrxqi5ElnPggBtnFR3J734 7AQVMrONnaxTH_rnSlJ4TveCiEiqxk.AX9850Yfe7Y.8Udi0mgxM- Received: from [81.129.249.231] by web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:44:38 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,wqAKV2VsbCBzYWlkIFJpayEKCgo3MyBlcyBHTCBQZXRlIE0wRk1UIElPOTFVWAoKCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwo.IEZyb206IFJpayBTdHJvYmJlIDxSaWsuU3Ryb2JiZUBmeXMua3VsZXV2ZW4uYmU.Cj5UbzogInJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmciIDxyc2diX2xmX2dyb3VwQGJsYWNrc2hlZXAub3JnPiAKPlNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgOCBGZWJydWFyeSAyMDEzLCA5OjE4Cj5TdWJqZWN0OiBMRjogUkU6IE5SUkwgcHJvcG9zYWwgZm9yIGEgNjMwbSBCYW5kIFBsYW4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.132.503 References: <33a081ba8fa54d99adcf8022fbb0c07b@kabelmail.de>,<981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> Message-ID: <1360316678.55798.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:44:38 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview:  Well said Rik! 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: Rik Strobbe >To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" >Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 9:18 >Subject: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan > >Hi Tony, > >is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienna? >I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis? > >73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > >Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens traumwandler@sensemail.ch [traumwandler@sensemail.ch] >Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2013 9:24 >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Onderwerp: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan > >Are you aware of this proposal? >What do you think about it? >73 de Toni, HB9ASB > > >Recommendation >From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to >present the >following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan: >472 - 479 kHz (630 m) >472 - 475 kHz CW only – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz >  472.000 - 472.150 CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated) >  472.150 - 472.300 CW QRSS >  472.600          CW DX Calling >  474.750          CW Calling >475 - 479 kHz CW + digimodes – maximum bandwidth 500 Hz >Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where >radio >amateurs are secondary users. >Comment: >NRRL feels that it will be premature to further subdivide different >digimodes. This >may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after >considering >experiences. > > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.95 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1bc6486c2865e7dc2ff7578e6d7fc226 Subject: Re: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604a5114c9783384 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =C2=A0=0AWell said Rik!=0A=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>_______= _________________________=0A> From: Rik Strobbe =0A>To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" =0A= >Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 9:18=0A>Subject: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for = a 630m Band Plan=0A> =0A>Hi Tony,=0A>=0A>is this a proposal for the interi= m meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienna?=0A>I think it is far too early= for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis?=0A>=0A>73, Rik=C2=A0 ON7Y= D - OR7T=0A>=0A>________________________________________=0A>Van: owner-rsgb= _lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens traumw= andler@sensemail.ch [traumwandler@sensemail.ch]=0A>Verzonden: vrijdag 8 feb= ruari 2013 9:24=0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A>Onderwerp: LF: NRRL = proposal for a 630m Band Plan=0A>=0A>Are you aware of this proposal?=0A>Wha= t do you think about it?=0A>73 de Toni, HB9ASB=0A>=0A>=0A>Recommendation=0A= >From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to=0A>presen= t the=0A>following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan:=0A>472 - 47= 9 kHz (630 m)=0A>472 - 475 kHz=C2=A0 CW only =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 20= 0 Hz=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 472.000 - 472.150=C2=A0 CW Beacons only (IARU coordi= nated)=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 472.150 - 472.300=C2=A0 CW QRSS=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = 472.600=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 CW DX Calling=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 474.750=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 CW Calling=0A>475 - 479 kHz=C2=A0 C= W + digimodes =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 500 Hz=0A>Contests should be disc= ouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where=0A>radio=0A>amateurs are secon= dary users.=0A>Comment:=0A>NRRL feels that it will be premature to further = subdivide different=0A>digimodes. This=0A>may be better to do at the next c= onference, if necessary, after=0A>considering=0A>experiences.=0A>=0A>=0A> = --131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Well said Rik!

73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: Rik Stro= bbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
<= b>Sent: Friday, 8 February 20= 13, 9:18
Subject: LF: = RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan

Hi Tony,
=
is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in V= ienna?
I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical r= egulatitis?

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

____________________= ____________________
Van: owner-rsgb_lf= _group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org] namens traumwandler@sensemail.ch [traumwandler@sensemail.ch]
Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februar= i 2013 9:24
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.orgOnderwerp: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan

Are you aware of= this proposal?
What do you think about it?
73 de Toni, HB9ASB

Recommendation
From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time b= eing) like to
present the
following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region = 1 bandplan:
472 - 479 kHz (630 m)
472 - 475 kHz  CW only =E2=80= =93 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz
    472.000 - 472.150  CW B= eacons only (IARU coordinated)
    472.150 - 472.300  CW= QRSS
    472.600            &n= bsp;       CW DX Calling
    474.750  &n= bsp;                 CW Calling
475= - 479 kHz  CW + digimodes =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 500 Hz
Conte= sts should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where
radio
= amateurs are secondary users.
Comment:
NRRL feels that it will be pre= mature to further subdivide different
digimodes. This
may be better t= o do at the next conference, if necessary, after
considering
experien= ces.


--131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798--