Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AD97C380000A9;
	Fri,  8 Feb 2013 04:46:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1U3kW4-000888-DU
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:08 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1U3kW2-00087z-KX
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:06 +0000
Received: from nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.95])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>)
	id 1U3kVz-0003Iy-Ts
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:45:05 +0000
Received: from [77.238.189.50] by nm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 09:44:39 -0000
Received: from [212.82.108.117] by tm3.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 09:44:39 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 09:44:39 -0000
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 376554.61971.bm@omp1026.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 66330 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2013 09:44:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1360316678; bh=86oJdTIEXqqWAAia+HoPpxU8XgiUNj8SE/BOLHuaIQk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Zh9rosmby2VKOeB4zfCpzq8ckWuktBop6+HNKaspooflwgr09DrfiRMUnqaAPmDxr+EUAmCCHI822IBZNzsQkCeInpb3DAKiyGnd9US3fjIxjFpng2BFv6Nt15IUBeljOUcBRyOav+4x0Kj4vDPnckHZU76PN+yaUGksMv75ii8=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=IsvpMJKkUJ012geVqB2ojG27TsizK15aR6OgmB/KIFDTge8QWhpHtG9L1iJY7iZZPAG5OPSIH2TbrdZU9nsWSFgzegOcrVoADYvoQ6RBmq4gqxVkrZzi52yvMG1r7dBazwDM/5YOIJnBlpBxxOR6HAHiVJjJAyFKPQSrVxibmdg=;
X-YMail-OSG: jGfYsN4VM1mvSjd2e1Xghbo4bmlH7YzDLLKEtSymmLorSFA
 IloJGaLg_qujh3CY06R0SzRFkJ.QMB3ZWg_WKW_T.Qh0BYpcm0w8j9b2kAA2
 ftmz6nZWs3OLjs3C8DGjd_FVHS36gWxXjbIkJbGUq.e47XGzE5gXZ3_w_cNR
 AtisO00HnIpJjOVS_YTpPXMkGueZ.D9JJlEMXAQoPqIxERo4c2tm0mXAmSQA
 wfaOC2zVTQosNUBH6TIYRyx.UCjLlrcbLGhbH.0kY4JVkTgzUaYGKSlhfUe1
 eKMQ2rHvCU4piuNUTaa7PZ5gBOTxCt4oCtVOtZMJGkqRpV3Pyvq2XeD4lSf7
 jK8ZrNXp.2EWn6VQ22GOgX6aAmrhMAdCYrbGD9Biy8YoKNVt3N9MYTufSERo
 QTVjq5VnZkRW0HVAlSOgjOqY2.xPDU7_MH8x8qNrxqi5ElnPggBtnFR3J734
 7AQVMrONnaxTH_rnSlJ4TveCiEiqxk.AX9850Yfe7Y.8Udi0mgxM-
Received: from [81.129.249.231] by web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:44:38 GMT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,wqAKV2VsbCBzYWlkIFJpayEKCgo3MyBlcyBHTCBQZXRlIE0wRk1UIElPOTFVWAoKCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwo.IEZyb206IFJpayBTdHJvYmJlIDxSaWsuU3Ryb2JiZUBmeXMua3VsZXV2ZW4uYmU.Cj5UbzogInJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmciIDxyc2diX2xmX2dyb3VwQGJsYWNrc2hlZXAub3JnPiAKPlNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgOCBGZWJydWFyeSAyMDEzLCA5OjE4Cj5TdWJqZWN0OiBMRjogUkU6IE5SUkwgcHJvcG9zYWwgZm9yIGEgNjMwbSBCYW5kIFBsYW4BMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.132.503
References: <33a081ba8fa54d99adcf8022fbb0c07b@kabelmail.de>,<981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
Message-ID: <1360316678.55798.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:44:38 +0000 (GMT)
From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Â Well said Rik! 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: Rik
   Strobbe >To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" >Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013,
    9:18 >Subject: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan > >Hi Tony, > >is
    this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienna?
    >I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis?
    > >73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > >Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]
    namens traumwandler@sensemail.ch [traumwandler@sensemail.ch] >Verzonden:
   vrijdag 8 februari 2013 9:24 >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Onderwerp:
    LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan > >Are you aware of this proposal?
    >What do you think about it? >73 de Toni, HB9ASB > > >Recommendation >From
    the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to >present the
   >following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan: >472 - 479 kHz (630
    m) >472 - 475 kHz CW only – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz >  472.000 - 472.150Â
    CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated) >Â Â 472.150 - 472.300Â CW QRSS >Â Â 472.600Â
    Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â CW DX Calling >Â Â 474.750Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â CW Calling
    >475 - 479 kHz CW + digimodes – maximum bandwidth 500 Hz >Contests should
    be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where >radio >amateurs are
   secondary users. >Comment: >NRRL feels that it will be premature to further
    subdivide different >digimodes. This >may be better to do at the next conference,
    if necessary, after >considering >experiences. > > > [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [77.238.189.95 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk)
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 1bc6486c2865e7dc2ff7578e6d7fc226
Subject: Re: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,
	TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604a5114c9783384
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


--131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=C2=A0=0AWell said Rik!=0A=0A=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>_______=
_________________________=0A> From: Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.b=
e>=0A>To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> =0A=
>Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 9:18=0A>Subject: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for =
a 630m Band Plan=0A>  =0A>Hi Tony,=0A>=0A>is this a proposal for the interi=
m meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienna?=0A>I think it is far too early=
 for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis?=0A>=0A>73, Rik=C2=A0 ON7Y=
D - OR7T=0A>=0A>________________________________________=0A>Van: owner-rsgb=
_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens traumw=
andler@sensemail.ch [traumwandler@sensemail.ch]=0A>Verzonden: vrijdag 8 feb=
ruari 2013 9:24=0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=0A>Onderwerp: LF: NRRL =
proposal for a 630m Band Plan=0A>=0A>Are you aware of this proposal?=0A>Wha=
t do you think about it?=0A>73 de Toni, HB9ASB=0A>=0A>=0A>Recommendation=0A=
>From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to=0A>presen=
t the=0A>following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan:=0A>472 - 47=
9 kHz (630 m)=0A>472 - 475 kHz=C2=A0 CW only =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 20=
0 Hz=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0  472.000 - 472.150=C2=A0 CW Beacons only (IARU coordi=
nated)=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0  472.150 - 472.300=C2=A0 CW QRSS=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0  =
472.600=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0  CW DX Calling=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0  474.750=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0  CW Calling=0A>475 - 479 kHz=C2=A0 C=
W + digimodes =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 500 Hz=0A>Contests should be disc=
ouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where=0A>radio=0A>amateurs are secon=
dary users.=0A>Comment:=0A>NRRL feels that it will be premature to further =
subdivide different=0A>digimodes. This=0A>may be better to do at the next c=
onference, if necessary, after=0A>considering=0A>experiences.=0A>=0A>=0A>  =
 
--131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ar=
ial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span><var id=3D"yui-ie-cur=
sor"></var></span>&nbsp;</div><div><span>Well said Rik!</span><br><br></div=
><div>73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX<br> <blockquote style=3D"padding-left: 5px=
; margin-top: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left-color: rgb(16, 16, 255); b=
order-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid;">  <div style=3D"font-fami=
ly: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"> <div style=3D"font-fam=
ily: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir=
=3D"ltr"> <font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"> <div style=3D"margin: 5px 0px; p=
adding: 0px; border: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); height: 0px; line-height=
: 0; font-size: 0px;" class=3D"hr" contentEditable=3D"false" readonly=3D"tr=
ue"></div>  <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Rik Stro=
bbe &lt;Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be&gt;<br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: =
bold;">To:</span></b>
 "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" &lt;rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org&gt; <br> <=
b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, 8 February 20=
13, 9:18<br> <b><span style=3D"font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> LF: =
RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan<br> </font> </div> <br>Hi Tony,<br> =
<br>is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in V=
ienna?<br>I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical r=
egulatitis?<br> <br>73, Rik&nbsp; ON7YD - OR7T<br> <br>____________________=
____________________<br>Van: <a href=3D"mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blackshe=
ep.org" ymailto=3D"mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">owner-rsgb_lf=
_group@blacksheep.org</a> [<a href=3D"mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=
.org" ymailto=3D"mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">owner-rsgb_lf_g=
roup@blacksheep.org</a>] namens <a href=3D"mailto:traumwandler@sensemail.ch=
" ymailto=3D"mailto:traumwandler@sensemail.ch">traumwandler@sensemail.ch</a=
> [<a
 href=3D"mailto:traumwandler@sensemail.ch" ymailto=3D"mailto:traumwandler@s=
ensemail.ch">traumwandler@sensemail.ch</a>]<br>Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februar=
i 2013 9:24<br>To: <a href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" ymailto=
=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org</a><b=
r>Onderwerp: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan<br><br>Are you aware of=
 this proposal?<br>What do you think about it?<br>73 de Toni, HB9ASB<br><br=
><br>Recommendation<br> From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time b=
eing) like to<br>present the<br>following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region =
1 bandplan:<br>472 - 479 kHz (630 m)<br>472 - 475 kHz&nbsp; CW only =E2=80=
=93 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;  472.000 - 472.150&nbsp; CW B=
eacons only (IARU coordinated)<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;  472.150 - 472.300&nbsp; CW=
 QRSS<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;  472.600&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &n=
bsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;  CW DX Calling<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;  474.750&nbsp; &n=
bsp;
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;  CW Calling<br>475=
 - 479 kHz&nbsp; CW + digimodes =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 500 Hz<br>Conte=
sts should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where<br>radio<br>=
amateurs are secondary users.<br>Comment:<br>NRRL feels that it will be pre=
mature to further subdivide different<br>digimodes. This<br>may be better t=
o do at the next conference, if necessary, after<br>considering<br>experien=
ces.<br><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote>  </div></div></body></html>
--131296447-1930725407-1360316678=:55798--